Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 21, 2026

Calibrated Forceps Model of Spinal Cord Compression Injury
09:41

Calibrated Forceps Model of Spinal Cord Compression Injury

Published on: April 24, 2015

Spinal cord Compression Outcomes Of Treatment (SCOOT) Delphi study.

Sheweidin Aziz1, Krishan Almeida1, Maria Armaou1

  • 1Leicester Royal Infirmary, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UK.

Journal of Spine Surgery (Hong Kong)
|May 20, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accuracy of colposcopy to triage HPV-positive women in cervical cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Yield of Fecal Immunochemical Test Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Adults Aged 45-49 vs 50-54 years.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Patient experiences of Dupuytren's contracture and its treatment : a qualitative investigation.

Bone & joint open·2026
Same author

Clinical Validation of Four Point-of-Care High-Risk HPV Assays, Including Two Reduced-Valency Assays, for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Settings.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Structure and function of periplasmic nitrate reductase.

Biochemical Society transactions·2026
Same author

Memory Cell and Antibody Responses Following a Single Versus Two Doses of Escherichia coli-Produced Vaccine Against Human Papillomavirus Types 16 and 18: A Real-World Study in Chinese Girls.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same journal

Real-world outcomes of minimally invasive posterior thoracic and lumbar spine fusion surgery versus open surgery in the Finnish Spine Registry.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same journal

Defining spine care: a framework for scope, standards, and bidirectional care transitions.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same journal

Interlaminar versus sublaminar lumbar decompression: a retrospective study on patient satisfaction as measured by PROMIS outcomes.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same journal

Advancements in sagittal alignment parameters and management of adult spine deformities.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same journal

L5/S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion: anatomical and technical considerations.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
Same journal

Microvascular anatomy and mapping of intraosseous arterioles in the human L1 vertebral body: a histological study, literature comparison, and relevance for fracture healing.

Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong)·2026
See all related articles

Expert consensus defines surgical intervention thresholds for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). Key factors include tumor type, neurological status, and pain scores (VAS 6/10) for improved patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Neurosurgery
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Improved cancer survival leads to increased metastatic disease, including metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).
  • Managing MSCC patients requires individualized treatment approaches due to complexity.
  • Identifying optimal surgical intervention thresholds is crucial for effective MSCC management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify thresholds for surgical intervention in metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) patients.
  • To determine the key factors influencing surgical decision-making for MSCC.
  • To develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for MSCC.

Main Methods:

  • A modified Delphi study involving a predefined expert panel.
  • Quantitative and qualitative analysis of clinical vignettes representing common MSCC primary tumors.
Keywords:
DelphiMetastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)management algorithmmetastasesspinal metastases

More Related Videos

A Novel Vertebral Stabilization Method for Producing Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
09:24

A Novel Vertebral Stabilization Method for Producing Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: January 5, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 21, 2026

Calibrated Forceps Model of Spinal Cord Compression Injury
09:41

Calibrated Forceps Model of Spinal Cord Compression Injury

Published on: April 24, 2015

A Novel Vertebral Stabilization Method for Producing Contusive Spinal Cord Injury
09:24

A Novel Vertebral Stabilization Method for Producing Contusive Spinal Cord Injury

Published on: January 5, 2015

  • Decision-making questionnaires based on RAND criteria and percentage agreement.

    • Main Results:

    • Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) was commonly used; primary tumor, neurological function, and spinal lesion type were significant factors.
    • 74% of experts would not operate on paralyzed patients, while 33% would operate within 24 hours of paralysis onset.
    • A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score of 6/10 was a surgical intervention threshold, with 82% expecting pain relief.

    Conclusions:

    • Surgical indications for MSCC include spinal instability and a VAS of 6/10.
    • Prognosis and pain levels are major factors influencing surgical decisions.
    • Specific primary tumors (lung, myeloma, unknown) require careful consideration in MSCC management.