Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Point-of-Care Ultrasound for Peripheral Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Without Left Ventricular Venting
Published on: January 17, 2025
Occurrence of Left Ventricular Cavity Obliteration
K Tamilselvan1, Aashish Arumugam1, Magesh Vadivelu1
1Department of Cardiology, Meenakshi Medical College and Research Institute, Kanchipuram, IND.
Insights
Left ventricular cavity obliteration (LVCO) occurred in over half of patients with LV intracavitary gradients. This hemodynamic pattern, not tied to specific diagnoses, warrants further investigation in cardiology.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Hemodynamics
Background:
- Left ventricular cavity obliteration (LVCO) is an echocardiographic finding of systolic apposition of ventricular walls.
- Its clinical profile in patients with left ventricular (LV) intracavitary gradients is not well-defined.
- This study investigates LVCO occurrence and predictors in patients with Doppler-detected LV cavity gradients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prevalence of LVCO in patients with LV intracavitary gradients.
- To identify echocardiographic predictors of LVCO in this patient group.
- To explore the association between LVCO and specific cardiac diagnoses.
Main Methods:
- Prospective observational cross-sectional study of 60 adults with LV intracavitary gradients ≥30 mmHg.
- LVCO defined using integrated 2D and Doppler echocardiography.
- Statistical analysis included chi-square, t-tests, and logistic regression to assess associations and predictors.
Main Results:
- LVCO was present in 51.7% of patients (31/60).
- Dilated and hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy were the most common diagnoses.
- LVCO was not significantly associated with diagnostic category or LV cavity size; higher baseline LV gradient inversely correlated with LVCO.
Conclusions:
- LVCO is a frequent finding in patients with LV intracavitary gradients.
- LVCO appears to be a dynamic hemodynamic pattern rather than a diagnosis-specific marker.
- Further research is needed to confirm these preliminary, hypothesis-generating findings.
Background:
Left ventricular cavity obliteration (LVCO) is an echocardiographic phenomenon characterized by near-complete systolic apposition of the ventricular walls with associated intracavitary flow acceleration and gradient formation. Although often discussed in relation to hypertrophic phenotypes, its clinical profile and diagnostic spectrum among patients with left ventricular (LV) intracavitary gradients remain insufficiently described. This study evaluated the occurrence and echocardiographic predictors of LVCO in patients with Doppler-detected LV cavity gradients.
Methods:
This hospital-based prospective observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Cardiology at Meenakshi Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Kanchipuram, India, from November 2024 to December 2025. Sixty consecutive adults with a peak Doppler LV intracavitary gradient of at least 30 mmHg on transthoracic echocardiography were included. LVCO was defined using integrated two-dimensional and Doppler criteria. Associations with diagnostic category were assessed using the Pearson chi-square test, cavity size differences using the independent-samples t-test, and predictors of LVCO using binary logistic regression.
Results:
The mean age of the cohort was 48.87 ± 18.88 years; 25 patients (41.7%) were male and 35 (58.3%) were female. LVCO was present in 31 of 60 patients (51.7%). Dilated cardiomyopathy was the most frequent diagnosis overall (20/60, 33.3%), followed by hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (17/60, 28.3%). The distribution of diagnostic categories did not differ significantly according to LVCO status (χ²(3) = 3.90, p = 0.272). Among 50 patients with available cavity measurements, mean LV cavity size was comparable between groups (37.39 ± 0.67 mm vs 37.18 ± 0.81 mm; t(48) = 1.00, p = 0.323). On logistic regression, hypertension showed a non-significant trend toward higher odds of LVCO (odds ratio [OR] 5.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-29.0, p = 0.054), whereas the peak baseline LV gradient showed a statistically significant but modest inverse association with LVCO (OR 0.97 per 1 mmHg increase, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, p = 0.030). The model showed acceptable apparent discrimination and calibration within the study sample, with an area under the curve of 0.80, Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic of 6.20 (p = 0.61), and Nagelkerke R² of 0.32; however, the discriminative estimate may be optimistic given the modest sample size and lack of validation.
Conclusions:
LVCO was a frequent finding in patients with echocardiographic LV intracavitary gradients but was not significantly associated with a single diagnostic category. These findings suggest that, in this selected hospital-based cohort of patients with measurable intracavitary gradients, LVCO may be better interpreted as a dynamic hemodynamic pattern rather than a diagnosis-specific marker; however, this inference should be considered preliminary and hypothesis-generating.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Imbalances in Cardiac Output
CHF can occur due to the failure of either side of the heart. Left-side failure leads to pulmonary congestion—the right side continues to send blood...

