Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Fat-Water Phantoms for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Validation: A Flexible and Scalable Protocol
Published on: September 7, 2018
Cross-Vendor Validation of Proton Density Fat Fraction and T1 Mapping Using a Combined Proton Density Fat Fraction-T1
Jitka Starekova1, Sebastian Weingärtner2, David R Rutkowski3
1Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Background:
In chronic liver disease, fat and fibroinflammatory changes often coexist. However, their biomarkers, proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and T1, are typically assessed separately. Their reproducibility under mutual confounding remains unclear.
Purpose:
To assess multicenter, multi-vendor reproducibility of confounder-corrected chemical shift-encoded (CSE)-MRI-based PDFF mapping and MOLLI-based T1 mapping using a combined PDFF-T1 phantom.
Study Type:
Prospective phantom study.
Phantom:
Commercial PDFF-T1 Phantom (Model 725) with varying PDFF (0%-30%) and T1 (200-1400 ms) values.
Field Strength/Sequence:
1.5 T and 3 T multi-echo, three-dimensional spoiled-gradient-echo (SGRE) sequence for PDFF mapping, and MOLLI sequence (5(3)3 acquisition scheme) using two-dimensional SGRE readouts for T1 mapping across four centers and vendors.
Assessment:
PDFF and T1 maps were acquired using standardized protocols. PDFF maps were reconstructed locally, while T1 maps were generated using a centralized algorithm. All maps were quantitatively analyzed by a single radiologist using standardized region-of-interest placement. Phantom temporal stability was assessed at one center across five sessions over 9 months (baseline, retest, 1 week, 6 and 9 months).
Statistical Tests:
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), reproducibility coefficients (RDC), and linear regression analysis were used. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results:
PDFF showed overall excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.987, RDC = 3.7%), with increased variability at higher T1 values (RDC up to 7.9% at T1 = 1400 ms). T1 mapping showed good reproducibility in the absence of fat (RDC 16-161 ms at PDFF = 0%), but moderate to poor reproducibility in the presence of fat, with RDC increasing up to 1553 ms at PDFF 30%. Temporal stability was excellent ICC ≥ 0.998 for both PDFF and T1, and RDC of 1.1%-1.3% for PDFF and 52-57 ms for T1.
Data Conclusion:
This phantom study demonstrated high reproducibility of PDFF, whereas T1 reproducibility deteriorated at higher fat and T1 levels, underscoring the need for fat-corrected T1 mapping for reliable assessment of fibroinflammatory changes.
Evidence Level:
N/A.
Technical Efficacy:
Stage 1.
More Related Videos
06:33Construction of a Preclinical Multimodality Phantom Using Tissue-mimicking Materials for Quality Assurance in Tumor Size Measurement
Published on: July 29, 2013
09:21Human Brown Adipose Tissue Depots Automatically Segmented by Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Registered Magnetic Resonance Images
Published on: February 18, 2015