Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Measurement of the Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient and Transjugular Liver Biopsy
Published on: June 18, 2020
Predictive performance of CT-based artificial intelligence for predicting variceal bleeding in portal hypertension: a
Chao Zhu1, Qi Liu1, Wenhui Tao2
1Department of Gastroenterology, People's Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.
Objectives:
To systematically evaluate the predictive accuracy of computed tomography (CT)-based artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting variceal bleeding (VB) in patients with portal hypertension, and to assess their potential utility as an opportunistic screening tool alongside Baveno VII criteria.
Methods:
We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane until December 16, 2025, for studies applying radiomics or machine learning algorithms to abdominal CT images for VB prediction. Quality was assessed using PROBAST + AI. A bivariate random-effects model was employed to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC).
Results:
Ten studies encompassing 2,470 patients were included. CT-based AI models demonstrated promising predictive performance with a pooled sensitivity of 0.81 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.73-0.87), specificity of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91), and an AUC of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). Unimodal image-only models achieved higher sensitivity than multimodal models (0.84 vs. 0.78). While a Vision Transformer architecture achieved the highest accuracy (AUC 0.98), it was limited to internal validation. Fagan's nomogram indicated a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23, reducing an assumed post-test probability of bleeding from 20% to 5%.
Conclusion:
CT-based AI models exhibit high predictive efficacy and offer a promising non-invasive "gatekeeper" strategy for risk stratification. By leveraging routine imaging, these models may reduce unnecessary endoscopies for low-risk patients. However, given the reliance on internal validation and HBV-predominant cohorts, results should be interpreted as valuable adjunctive evidence rather than a standalone replacement. Large-scale, international multi-center validation is required to confirm generalizability before clinical implementation.
More Related Videos
04:09Predicting Treatment Response to Image-Guided Therapies Using Machine Learning: An Example for Trans-Arterial Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Published on: October 10, 2018
04:00Laparoscopic Splenectomy with Pericardial Devascularization for Hypersplenism and Esophageal Variceal Hemorrhage Due to Portal Hypertension
Published on: November 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Portal Hypertension
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction