Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 21, 2026

Making MR Imaging Child's Play - Pediatric Neuroimaging Protocol, Guidelines and Procedure
Published on: July 30, 2009
Hospital and Emergency Department Pediatric Capability, Patient Characteristics, and Radiology Imaging for Children
Margaret E Samuels-Kalow1, Rebecca E Cash1, Kenneth A Michelson2
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Insights
Pediatric emergency department imaging use varied by insurance and race, with public insurance and minority children receiving less imaging. Hospital pediatric capabilities did not alter these disparities, highlighting a need for equitable care improvements.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Health Services Research
- Health Equity
Background:
- Judicious use of radiology imaging is crucial in pediatric emergency care.
- Prior research indicates disparities in imaging utilization based on insurance status and race/ethnicity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether hospital and emergency department (ED) pediatric capabilities influence the association between insurance, race/ethnicity, and imaging utilization in children.
- To examine disparities in pediatric imaging use.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study using 2019 State Emergency Department and State Inpatient Databases from 8 states, linked with national ED inventory and pediatric readiness data.
- Analysis included over 857,000 pediatric ED visits for asthma, head trauma, or abdominal trauma.
- Mixed-effects logistic regression models adjusted for patient and hospital factors to assess imaging utilization by insurance and race/ethnicity.
Main Results:
- Children with public insurance were less likely to undergo recommended imaging compared to those with private insurance across all conditions.
- Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic children were less likely to undergo imaging compared to non-Hispanic White children.
- While pediatric capabilities were associated with some differences in imaging use, they did not change the disparities observed based on insurance or race/ethnicity.
Conclusions:
- Increased pediatric capability in emergency departments did not mitigate disparities in imaging utilization by insurance status or race/ethnicity.
- Further interventions are necessary to ensure that pediatric capabilities enhance the quality and equity of emergency care for all children.
- Addressing systemic inequities in pediatric imaging is essential.
Importance:
Judicious use of radiology imaging is an important quality measure in emergency care for children. Prior studies have shown differences in imaging utilization by insurance status and race and ethnicity.
Objective:
To examine if measures of hospital and emergency department (ED) pediatric capabilities modify the association between insurance, race and ethnicity, and imaging utilization.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This retrospective cohort study combined data from the 2019 State Emergency Department and State Inpatient Databases of 8 states with the 2019 National Emergency Department Inventory-USA and the 2021 National Pediatric Readiness Project (NPRP) Survey on patients 18 years of age or younger. There were 857 034 total ED visits across 3 cohorts, encompassing patients with asthma, head trauma, or abdominal trauma. Statistical analysis was performed from May 2024 to January 2026.
Exposure:
Pediatric capability, as measured by presence of a pediatric emergency care coordinator, readiness according to NPRP data, and hospital functional capability (inpatient and intensive care unit bed status).
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The association of insurance and race and ethnicity (separate models) with imaging utilization was examined across the 3 cohorts. Chest radiography was evaluated for patients with asthma, head computed tomography (CT) was evaluated for patients with head trauma, and abdominal CT was evaluated for patients with abdominal trauma. Separate mixed-effects logistic regression models were constructed, adjusting for age, sex, presence of a complex chronic condition, diagnostic grouping system severity score, hospital pediatric ED visit volume, and complexity of the hospital patient mix (percentage of patients with complex chronic conditions and mean severity clinical score) with random intercept for hospital. As a sensitivity analysis, these associations were examined separately for discharged patients.
Results:
There were 857 034 total ED visits in the 3 cohorts, encompassing patients with asthma (380 719 ED visits; mean [SD] age, 9.6 [5.0] years; 210 598 male [55%]), head trauma (435 644 ED visits; mean [SD] age, 7.2 [5.7] years; 264 004 male [61%]), and abdominal trauma (40 671 ED visits; mean [SD] age, 11.0 [5.4] years; 21 632 male [53%]). Children with public insurance were less likely to have undergone imaging across all measures compared with those with private insurance (asthma: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.85 [95% CI, 0.83-0.86]; head trauma: AOR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.75-0.78]; abdominal trauma: AOR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.55-0.63]). In the adjusted model, compared with non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to have undergone imaging across all measures (non-Hispanic Black, asthma: AOR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.81-0.85]; non-Hispanic Black, head trauma: AOR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.74-0.79]; non-Hispanic Black, abdominal trauma: AOR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.55-0.65]; Hispanic, asthma: AOR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.89-0.93]; Hispanic, head trauma: AOR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.82-0.87]; Hispanic, abdominal trauma: AOR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66-0.80]). The presence of pediatric capability was associated with differences in imaging utilization, but not with changes in the pattern of association between either insurance or race and ethnicity and imaging utilization. Similar results were observed among those who were discharged.
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this cohort study of pediatric ED visits, increased pediatric capability was not associated with differences in the patterns of imaging utilization by insurance status or race and ethnicity. Additional efforts are needed to ensure that pediatric capability improves quality and equity of care.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System III: X-Ray
Definition and Purpose
An X-ray, or radiograph, is a non-invasive method that uses ionizing radiation to take images of internal structures. It is mainly used in cardiac imaging to examine the heart, lungs, and major blood vessels, aiming to identify abnormalities in the heart's size, shape, and position, such as heart failure, congenital defects, and vascular...
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...
