Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Synthesis and Characterization of Functionalized Metal-organic Frameworks
Published on: September 5, 2014
Per-MOF Mechanistic Attribution Reveals Context-Dependent Stability Mechanisms in Metal-Organic Frameworks
Sanjay Singh1, Vinod Gadi1, Srinivasa Reddy Mothe1
1Navencia Pte. Ltd., Singapore 689862, Singapore.
None:
Water stability remains a critical barrier to the practical deployment of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) in aqueous and industrial environments. While recent machine-learning studies have achieved strong predictive performance for MOF water stability, most rely on global feature importance rankings that implicitly assume uniform mechanisms across all frameworks. However, degradation mechanisms are known to vary with metal chemistry, linker composition, and framework topology, suggesting that instance-level analysis is needed to capture this mechanistic diversity. Here, we apply per-MOF SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) analysis to the recently curated WS24 data set, comprising 1,092 experimentally characterized frameworks with water stability labels. Unlike global feature selection methods such as recursive feature addition, per-MOF SHAP decomposes each prediction into stabilizing and destabilizing contributions from individual descriptors, enabling direct attribution of model-level feature contributions for specific MOFs. Using gradient-boosted decision trees with SHAP-selected features, we achieve test set performance of ROC-AUC = 0.811 and balanced accuracy = 0.723, comparable to recursive feature addition approaches on WS24. Instance-level analysis reveals that MOF water stability arises from multiple, context-dependent descriptor patterns: metal-centered descriptor patterns associated with unfavorable electronic properties, linker-dominated hydrolysis in frameworks with vulnerable organic chemistry, and context-dependent porosity effects. Quantitative analysis demonstrates that gravimetric surface area shows positive SHAP contributions in 73% of correctly predicted stable frameworks but negative contributions in 48% of correctly predicted unstable frameworks (t = 2.15, p = 0.033), confirming that identical descriptors can produce opposite model contributions depending on the chemical environment. This work establishes a practical framework for using interpretable machine learning to guide rational MOF design for aqueous applications while transparently revealing where current models and descriptors require refinement.
More Related Videos
06:53Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
Published on: June 9, 2023
07:14Experimental Approaches for the Synthesis of Low-Valent Metal-Organic Frameworks from Multitopic Phosphine Linkers
Published on: May 12, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Complexation Equilibria: Factors Influencing Stability of Complexes
Properties of Organometallic Compounds
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Metal-Ligand Bonds
In these complexes, transition metals form coordinate covalent bonds, a kind of Lewis acid-base interaction in which both of the electrons in the bond are contributed by a donor (Lewis base) to an electron acceptor (Lewis acid). The Lewis acid in...
Valence Bond Theory
MO Theory and Covalent Bonding