Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mean Absolute Deviation01:13

Mean Absolute Deviation

The mean absolute deviation is also a measure of the variability of data in a sample. It is the absolute value of the average difference between the data values and the mean.
Let us consider a dataset containing the number of unsold cupcakes in five shops: 10, 15, 8, 7, and 10. Initially, calculate the sample mean. Then calculate the deviation, or the difference, between each data value and the mean. Next, the absolute values of these deviations are added and divided by the sample size to...
Significance Testing: Overview01:04

Significance Testing: Overview

Significance testing is a set of statistical methods used to test whether a claim about a parameter is valid. In analytical chemistry, significance testing is used primarily to determine whether the difference between two values comes from determinate or random errors. The effect of a particular change in the measurement protocol, analyst, or sample itself can cause a deviation from the expected result. In the case of a suspected deviation/outlier, we need to be able to confirm mathematically...
Arithmetic Mean01:08

Arithmetic Mean

The arithmetic mean is the most commonly used measure of the central tendency of a data set. It is defined as the sum of all the elements constituting the data set, divided by the total number of elements. It is sometimes loosely referred to as the “average.”
When all the values in a data set are not unique, the sum in the numerator can be calculated by multiplying each distinct value by its frequency.
Sometimes, the arithmetic mean of a sample can be affected by a few data points that are...
Midrange01:07

Midrange

A somewhat easy to compute quantitative estimate of a data set’s central tendency is its midrange, which is defined as the mean of the minimum and maximum values of an ordered data set.
Simply put, the midrange is half of the data set’s range. Similar to the mean, the midrange is sensitive to the extreme values and hence the prospective outliers. However, unlike the mean, the midrange is not sensitive to all the values of the data set that lie in the middle. Thus, it is prone to outliers and...
Weighted Mean00:57

Weighted Mean

While taking the arithmetic, geometric, or harmonic mean of a sample data set, equal importance is assigned to all the data points. However, all the values may not always be equally important in some data sets. An intrinsic bias might make it more important to give more weightage to specific values over others.
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Root Mean Square00:57

Root Mean Square

If in an experiment, data values have a probability of being both positive and negative, neither the arithmetic mean, the geometric mean, nor the harmonic mean can be used to calculate the central tendency of the data set. In particular, if the positive and negative values are equally likely, the arithmetic mean is close to zero.
For example, consider the velocity of gas molecules in a container. The gas molecules are moving in different directions, which might impart positive and negative...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring Equitable Care Delivery: Insights From the Health Equity Report Card (HERC) Pilot in Academic Cancer Centers.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

What's New in Orthopaedic Rehabilitation.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026
Same author

Transitioning From CKD to Kidney Failure: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient Perspectives.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2026
Same author

QIM26-299: Initial Perspectives of the Health Equity Report Card (HERC) in Community Oncology Settings.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN·2026
Same author

Limited cancer health literacy rates and factors associated with cancer health literacy in persons with or without a cancer diagnosis.

Health literacy and communication open·2026
Same author

Evaluating Concordance Between Complex Outcome Measures: Letter to the Editor Regarding " Satisfied but Failed: Patient Satisfaction Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty Success Defined by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ".

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 22, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

The latent difference score model is a viable alternative to arithmetic difference score-based anchor-driven minimal

Levent Dumenci1, Daniel L Riddle2

  • 1Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. ldumenci@temple.edu.

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
|May 20, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Latent variable methods (LDSM) can estimate minimal important change (MIC) in patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) by controlling for measurement error. This approach offers advantages over traditional methods for knee osteoarthritis research.

Keywords:
MICOutcomePainPrognosis

More Related Videos

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 22, 2026

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
05:59

Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity

Published on: March 7, 2019

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Research
  • Health Outcomes

Background:

  • Traditional methods for estimating Minimal Important Change (MIC) from Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are susceptible to measurement error.
  • Latent Data Structure Models (LDSM) present a robust alternative for estimating MIC while accounting for this inherent error.
  • A framework for calculating anchor-based MICs is proposed, addressing multi-step considerations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To illustrate the application of Latent Data Structure Models (LDSM) for estimating Minimal Important Change (MIC).
  • To compare LDSM-based MIC estimates against traditional methods in the context of knee osteoarthritis.
  • To evaluate the performance of LDSM in controlling for measurement error in PROMs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized data from the KASTPain multi-center randomized clinical trial involving 364 participants with knee osteoarthritis post-arthroplasty.
  • Employed a structural equation modeling framework to implement Latent Data Structure Models (LDSM).
  • Estimated MICs for three common PROMs assessing pain and functional status.

Main Results:

  • Nine MIC estimates were generated using LDSM, crossing three PROMs with three post-intervention measurement occasions.
  • Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis demonstrated high predictive accuracy, with a median area under the curve (AUC) of 0.88 (range: 0.77-0.90).
  • LDSM effectively controlled for PROM measurement error in MIC estimation.

Conclusions:

  • Latent variable modeling of PROM change offers a method to exclude measurement error.
  • This approach may provide significant advantages over traditional methods for estimating Minimal Important Change (MIC).
  • LDSM is a valuable tool for accurate health outcomes research, particularly in chronic conditions like knee osteoarthritis.