Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 22, 2026

Measurement of Factor V Activity in Human Plasma Using a Microplate Coagulation Assay
Published on: September 9, 2012
A scoping review of factors affecting activated clotting time measurement results
Yuki Itagaki1, Mineji Hayakawa2,3, Kaori Okamoto4
1Department of Emergency Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
Background:
Activated clotting time (ACT), a widely used point-of-care test, monitors anticoagulation in clinical settings. Despite ACT technology advancements, some uncertainties remain regarding the factors influencing ACT measurements and inter-device variability. Although ACT is widely used for anticoagulation monitoring in clinical practice, the factors affecting ACT values are not fully understood, complicating their interpretation. This scoping review aims to address these challenges by examining the factors affecting ACT measurements, highlighting gaps in current knowledge.
Methods:
A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE (PubMed), including animal studies, clinical trials, observational studies, in vitro experiments, and systematic reviews. Article selection involved a two-step process: initial title and abstract screening followed by a full-text review, this was performed by three independent reviewers. Data from the included studies were charted and extracted, collecting information on factors influencing ACT measurements.
Results:
A total of 1908 records were identified, with 74 studies included after screening. Key factors influencing ACT measurements included platelet count, platelet inhibitors, and hematocrit levels. Direct thrombin inhibitors, low-molecular-weight heparin, and direct oral anticoagulants prolonged ACT with characteristics different from heparin. Aprotinin and nafamostat mesylate interacted with coagulation activators during ACT measurements affecting results. Significant differences in ACT measurements were observed between devices.
Conclusions:
This scoping review comprehensively analyzed factors influencing ACT and emphasized ACT measurement variability across devices. Despite its widespread use as a point-of-care test for anticoagulation monitoring, ACT's limitations and device discrepancies highlight the need for cautious interpretation in clinical settings.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.
More Related Videos
08:01The Nijmegen Hemostasis Assay: Simultaneous Fluorogenic Measurement of Thrombin and Plasmin Generation in a Single Well
Published on: February 27, 2026
09:38A Microfluidic Flow Chamber Model for Platelet Transfusion and Hemostasis Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Formation in Real-time
Published on: February 14, 2017