Timing of Restenosis and Reocclusion Following Endovascular Therapy for Femoropopliteal Lesions

Kenji Suzuki1, Daisuke Ueshima2, Kazuki Tobita3

  • 1Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Saiseikai Central Hospital, Tokyo, JPN.

Cureus
|May 21, 2026
PubMed

Insights

Different femoropopliteal devices show varying primary patency rates and distinct timing for restenosis and reocclusion. Understanding these differences is key for effective endovascular therapy.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Drug-eluting devices and covered stents are standard for femoropopliteal lesions.
  • Limited data exists on the specific restenosis and reocclusion patterns for these devices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare primary patency, restenosis, and reocclusion timing among four femoropopliteal endovascular devices.
  • To provide detailed insights into the performance differences of bare nitinol stents, covered stents, drug-eluting stents, and drug-coated balloons.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective, multicenter study included 2,786 femoropopliteal cases from seven institutes.
  • Patients were treated with bare nitinol stent (BNS), covered stent (CS), drug-eluting stent (DES), or drug-coated balloon (DCB).

Main Results:

  • Two-year primary patency rates were 62% (BNS), 75% (CS), 74% (DES), and 65% (DCB).
  • Lesion lengths and device backgrounds differed significantly (p<0.001).
  • Peak restenosis occurred 6-9 months (BNS, DCB) and 12-15 months (CS, DES); reocclusion varied from 0-3 months (DCB) to 6-9 months (BNS, DES).

Conclusions:

  • Primary patency rates vary significantly across the studied femoropopliteal devices.
  • The timing of restenosis and reocclusion is device-specific, influencing long-term outcomes.
Abstract