Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 23, 2026

Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
10:40

Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

Interbody Cages: Surface Technologies in Spinal Implants.

Joseph E Nassar1,2, Lama A Ammar1, Trevor L Toavs1

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume
|May 21, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparative analysis between mono-axial and poly-axial screws and their effect on rod and spine curvature mismatch in treatment of adult spinal deformity.

European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie·2026
Same author

High- vs. low-energy acetabular fractures: a propensity-matched analysis of outcomes and complications in four hundred and sixty four patients.

International orthopaedics·2026
Same author

Preoperative alignment and risk of proximal junctional failure : a framework for upper instrumented vertebra selection in adult spinal deformity.

The bone & joint journal·2026
Same author

Prediction of lower limb compensation for adult degenerative spine patients using spinopelvic parameters: a machine learning approach.

BMC musculoskeletal disorders·2026
Same author

Psychologic readiness for adult spinal deformity surgery: practical screening and optimization pathways.

Spine deformity·2026
Same author

Outcomes of Isolated Femoral Head and Polyethylene Liner Exchange in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Hip & pelvis·2026

Implant surface characteristics are crucial for spinal fusion success. While titanium and PEEK are common, surface modifications and new materials show promise, but further research is needed for optimal selection.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Spinal Fusion Technology

Background:

  • Implant surface characteristics significantly influence osseointegration and spinal fusion outcomes.
  • Titanium (Ti) and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) are prevalent interbody cage materials with unique pros and cons.
  • Surface modifications like roughening, porosity, and hydroxyapatite coatings improve osseointegration and early fusion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the role of implant surface characteristics in spinal fusion.
  • To compare common and emerging materials for interbody cages.
  • To assess the impact of surface modifications on fusion success.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of studies on spinal fusion implants.
  • Analysis of material properties and surface modifications.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 23, 2026

Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
10:40

Uniportal Full Endoscopic Posterolateral Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Published on: June 6, 2025

  • Evaluation of clinical outcomes related to implant surface characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Surface modifications enhance osseointegration and early fusion.
    • Emerging materials like silicon nitride and porous tantalum show potential.
    • No single material or surface technology demonstrates consistent clinical superiority.

    Conclusions:

    • Implant surface characteristics are critical for spinal fusion.
    • Ongoing research and evidence-based selection are necessary due to the lack of a universally superior option.
    • Further clinical validation is required for novel biomaterials and surface technologies.