Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

In Vivo Functional Study of Disease-associated Rare Human Variants Using Drosophila
Published on: August 20, 2019
Experimental and Computational Approaches to Identify Noncoding Pathogenic Variation in Rare Disease
Laura E Covill1,2,3, Lindsay Romo1,2,3, Anne O'Donnell-Luria1,2,3
11Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; email: lcovill@broadinstitute.org, lromo@broadinstitute.org, odonnell@broadinstitute.org.
Identifying pathogenic noncoding variants in rare developmental diseases is challenging. This review explores experimental and computational methods to interpret these variants, aiding clinical diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Genetics
- Genomics
- Developmental Biology
Background:
- Noncoding variants, found in noncoding genes and regulatory regions of protein-coding genes, are increasingly linked to developmental diseases.
- Interpreting the clinical significance of noncoding variants is difficult due to their unclear impact on gene expression compared to coding variants.
- Challenges in rare disease research include the inaccessibility of disease-relevant tissues for many conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current methods for identifying pathogenic noncoding variants in rare developmental diseases.
- To explore experimental and computational strategies for interpreting the functional impact of these variants.
- To propose an integrated approach for variant identification in affected patient cohorts.
Main Methods:
- Review of experimental approaches: high-throughput functional assays, omics data integration, and long-read sequencing.
- Review of computational methods: variant annotation, filtering, and machine learning for effect and pathogenicity prediction.
- Discussion of recent discoveries of developmental syndromes attributed to noncoding variants.
Main Results:
- Noncoding variants play a significant role in developmental diseases through various mechanisms.
- Established methods for variant interpretation face limitations, particularly with limited tissue availability.
- Advancements in functional assays, sequencing technologies, and computational tools are improving variant interpretation.
Conclusions:
- An integrated strategy combining experimental and computational methods is crucial for identifying pathogenic noncoding variants.
- Improved interpretation of noncoding variants will enhance diagnostic capabilities for rare developmental diseases.
- Further research into noncoding variant mechanisms can uncover novel therapeutic targets.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay (EMSA) and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay (DAPA)
Published on: August 21, 2016
07:15Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...