Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Anticancer Metal Complexes: Synthesis and Cytotoxicity Evaluation by the MTT Assay
Published on: November 10, 2013
A critical review of gold(I) complexes as anticancer agents: from canonical mechanisms to immune activation
Mingjuan Zhang1, Xiajun Yi1, Siying Xie1
1Guangzhou Vocational University of Science and Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510550, China.
Abstract:
Gold(I) complexes are historically used as anti-arthritic drugs, with two FDA-approved examples, auranofin (AF) and sodium aurothiomalate. Gold-based complexes have recently emerged as a class of anticancer agents. Their canonical mechanisms of action are closely tied to coordination chemistry, using various ligands that tune the stability, reactivity, and selectivity toward biomolecular targets. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies have validated that phosphines, N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs), thiolates, ions (anions), and alkynyl ligands orchestrate the cellular uptake, redox modulation, and interactions with key enzymes, such as thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), and other thiol or selenol enzymes through AuS and/or AuSe bond(s). These chemical and biological features endow gold(I) complexes with polypharmacological properties, including disruption of mitochondrial metabolism, induction of oxidative stress, and activation of apoptotic pathways. Importantly, recent studies have shown that some rationally designed gold(I) complexes, including AF, could interact with the immune system, thereby promoting immunogenic cell death (ICD), altering redox-sensitive cytokine signaling, and reshaping the tumor microenvironment (TME) to potentiate antitumor effects of immunotherapies. These promising preclinical data provide a mechanistic rationale for combining gold(I) complexes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and other immunotherapies, which have shifted cancer treatment to a new paradigm. While significant progress has been made, currently, AF is the only one under clinical trials for cancer. In this review, we intend to outline the principles of drug structure design, mechanistic insights, and medicinal chemistry innovations that have driven the field. We also critically discussed current challenges and proposed future directions for advancing gold(I) complexes. We concluded here that integrating medicinal chemistry-driven design with immuno-oncology strategies really holds great promise for translating more gold(I) complexes into more clinically viable anticancer therapeutics.
Related Concept Videos
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cytotoxic T Cells-mediated Immune Response
Immunological surveillance is the ability of immune cells to monitor and eliminate infected cells with intracellular pathogens, neoplastically transformed cells, and cells with non-self antigens. Cytotoxic T cells and NK...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Tumor Immunotherapy

