Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation in Gastrointestinal Cancer
Published on: September 18, 2020
A DNA Methylation-based algorithm Improves Lung Cancer risk prediction in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian
Kelsey Dawes1, James A Mills2, Richard M Hoffman3
1Behavioral Diagnostics, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Introduction:
Measuring DNA methylation levels at cg05575921 can improve prediction of lung cancer (LC) risk in a screening eligible population. However, these findings were based on a limited number of largely White study participants, with a history of heavy smoking (>30 pack years [PY]) and the cg05575921 based-metric was not directly compared to existing standards for LC prediction.] METHOD: We determined cg05575921 methylation levels in a nested case and control cohort featuring 1156 LC cases and 3039 controls, matched for age, sex, race and self-reported smoking status (current and former), who participated in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial. We then constructed survival algorithms that tested whether adding cg05575921 methylation levels to a model consisting of PLCOm2012and PY improved the prediction of time to lung cancer diagnosis as compared to the PLCOm2012algorithm.
Results:
Models adding cg05575921 methylation levels to PLCOm2012and PY significantly improved prediction of LC occurrence over 20-year follow up for subjects who report current or former smoking. In this set of subjects matched for age, sex and smoking status, a simple algorithm using cg05575921 and PY outperformed the PLCOm2012in all smokers (20-yr area under the curve [AUC] 0.725 vs 0.689), ≥ 20 PY smokers (20-yr AUC 0.662 vs 0.634) and < 20 PY smokers (20-yr AUC 0.666 vs 0.549). Among participants with < 20 PY smoking histories, those with cg05575921 methylation levels < 80% were at 3.3-fold greater risk for LC than those with similar PY history but with cg05575921 methylation levels > 80%.
Conclusion:
The use of cg05575921 methylation levels can improve the accuracy of LC risk prediction and may be particularly useful identifying persons with a < 20 PY history who are at elevated risk for LC.These findings require validation in an external screening population.
