Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

07:59
Ultra-Fast Amplicon-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Published on: September 8, 2023
Few-Shot Lung Cancer Classification via Electronic Nose Using Large Language Models: A Multicentre Prospective Study
Meng-Rui Lee1,2, Chien-Chi Huang3, Joyce Yue Sun4
1Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Summary
This study shows that large language models (LLMs) can effectively classify lung cancer using electronic nose (eNose) breathprints with minimal data. This approach offers a promising, non-invasive diagnostic tool that requires fewer training samples.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine
Background:
- Electronic Nose (eNose) breathprints show potential for non-invasive lung cancer diagnosis.
- Cross-site validation and adaptation are key challenges for clinical use of eNose technology.
- The efficacy of large language models (LLMs) for few-shot, site-specific lung cancer classification using eNose data is unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if a natural language processing-pretrained LLM can enable few-shot, site-specific classification of lung cancer from eNose breathprints.
- To compare the performance of an LLM against traditional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) in this task.
Main Methods:
- Collected 432 eNose breathprints from lung cancer and non-lung cancer patients across two medical centers in Taiwan.
- Utilized a GPT-2-backbone LLM with parameter-efficient adaptation.
- Compared LLM performance with CNNs trained from scratch or pretrained on CIFAR-100, using few-shot (2-6 samples/class) and full-data protocols.
Main Results:
- With 6 shots, the LLM achieved an AUC of 0.79 on Site 1 and 0.76 on Site 2.
- The LLM significantly outperformed both scratch CNNs and CIFAR-100 pretrained CNNs on both sites (p < 0.05).
- Transfer learning to a new site did not improve performance for either LLM or CNN models, with LLM performance even slightly decreasing.
Conclusions:
- Pretrained LLMs demonstrate potential for few-shot lung cancer classification using eNose breathprints in mixed clinical settings.
- This approach can reduce the need for extensive training datasets in developing non-invasive lung cancer diagnostics.
- Further research is needed to address cross-site adaptation challenges for robust clinical deployment.