Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 23, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Benchmarking B3LYP, PBE0 and M06L for nuclear spin-spin couplings against CC3: influence of geometry optimization
Elif Kucukefe1, Rodrigo A Cormanich2, Stephan P A Sauer1
1Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 5, 2100 Copenhagen∅, Denmark. sauer@chem.ku.dk.
Abstract:
We benchmark the DFT functionals B3LYP, PBE0, and M06L for calculating 45 indirect nuclear spin-spin coupling constants (SSCCs) in 13 electron correlation-rich small molecules, using high-level CC3 reference values from a previous study. The dataset spans a wide variety of one-, two-, and three-bond couplings, enabling a systematic assessment of functional performance and the impact of geometry optimization on SSCC calculations. Overall, PBE0 combined with PBE0-optimized geometries provides the closest match to CC3 results, followed by M06L at B3LYP or M06L geometries. A strong functional dependence is observed for fluorine-containing couplings: M06L markedly outperforms PBE0 and B3LYP for these, especially for one-bond C-F couplings, whereas PBE0 is clearly superior for couplings not involving fluorine. Across all molecules, the geometry-optimization method has a significant influence on the resulting SSCCs, and the best performance is consistently achieved when the same method is used for both geometry optimization and SSCC computation. In contrast, CCSD(T) geometries systematically yield the poorest agreement with CC3 SSCCs when combined with any of the three DFT functionals.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Molecular Geometry and Dipole Moments
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are slanted or...

