Reduced wait times for hepatology referrals in a prospective quality improvement initiative

Ofodile Joe-Uzuegbu1, Yashasavi Sachar2, Abdel Aziz Shaheen1

  • 1Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Insights

A quality improvement project significantly reduced hepatology referral wait times by implementing a multi-component strategy. This initiative improved access to care for routine liver disease referrals and backlog reduction.

Area of Science:

  • Hepatology
  • Quality Improvement
  • Healthcare Access

Background:

  • Increasing waitlist volumes for hepatology referrals due to population growth and rising chronic liver disease.
  • Prolonged wait times threaten timely surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment for liver conditions.
  • Quality improvement project conducted in a tertiary clinic utilizing a central access and triage (CAT) system.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reduce the median wait time for routine hepatology referrals by 50% (from 78.4 to 39 weeks).
  • To improve urgent and emergent wait times and decrease the overall waitlist size.
  • To implement a data-driven strategy within a CAT model to enhance patient access.

Main Methods:

  • Six Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles targeting referral coding, dedicated HBV clinic, triage criteria, waitlist management, and capacity expansion.
  • Recruitment of two additional hepatologists to increase service capacity.
  • Analysis of referral data using statistical process control (SPC) charts to monitor wait times and waitlist accrual.

Main Results:

  • Median routine referral wait time decreased from 78.4 to 8.4 weeks.
  • Urgent wait times reduced from 28.3 to 6.6 weeks; emergent wait times remained near the 2-week target.
  • Total waitlist size decreased from 1426 to 158 patients, with sustained negative net accrual indicating backlog reduction.

Conclusions:

  • A multi-component, data-driven strategy within a CAT model significantly improved access for routine hepatology referrals.
  • The strategy effectively protected timely care for higher-acuity patients.
  • The approach demonstrates potential applicability to other subspecialty clinics facing similar access challenges.
Abstract