Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

A New Single Chamber Implantable Defibrillator with Atrial Sensing: A Practical Demonstration of Sensing and Ease of Implantation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Implementation of double sequential defibrillation (DSD): an Aotearoa New Zealand observational study
Bridget Dicker1, Pablo Callejas2, Heather Hutchinson2
1Department of Paramedicine, School of Acute and Primary Health, Te Wānanga Aronui o Tāmaki Makaurau, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand; Clinical Evaluation, Research and Insights, Hato Hone St John, Auckland, New Zealand.
Double sequential defibrillation (DSD) did not improve survival outcomes for cardiac arrest patients. Patients receiving DSD had lower survival rates, possibly due to its use in critically ill individuals. Further research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Emergency medicine
- Cardiology
- Clinical research
Background:
- Double sequential defibrillation (DSD) is a new treatment for refractory ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT) in New Zealand.
- Its effectiveness and impact on patient survival are not yet well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare patient characteristics before and after DSD implementation.
- To evaluate the impact of DSD on survival outcomes in cardiac arrest patients.
- To analyze survival differences between patients receiving DSD and those not receiving DSD (NDSD), including early- and late-DSD subgroups.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective cohort study analyzing data from two 18-month periods (pre- and post-DSD implementation).
- Included cardiac arrest patients receiving more than three prehospital defibrillations.
- Compared outcomes using Chi-Square and Mann-Whitney U tests; logistic regression analyzed survival associations.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in Return of Spontaneous Circulation (ROSC) or 30-day survival was found between pre- and post-DSD periods.
- Forty-three percent of patients received DSD.
- Patients receiving any-DSD or late-DSD showed lower odds of ROSC and 30-day survival compared to NDSD patients.
Conclusions:
- DSD implementation did not demonstrate a survival benefit for cardiac arrest patients.
- Lower survival in DSD patients may be due to confounding factors, such as use in patients with poorer prognoses.
- Further investigation is required to determine optimal DSD timing and usage criteria.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
