Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Risk factors for adverse incidents in patients during helicopter emergency medical services transports: a scoping
Changchang Chen1, Kai Zhang1, Zhenhua Liu1
1Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Introduction:
Risk management is essential for maintaining the quality and safety of helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) worldwide. The scarcity of consolidated evidence on HEMS-specific risk factors hinders effective early prevention and risk mitigation. This scoping review aimed to summarize and map current research progress on risk factors for adverse incidents in patients during HEMS transports.
Methods:
This review was performed following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, ProQuest, CNKI, Wanfang Databases) were searched from January 1, 2006 to April 9, 2026. Studies in English or Chinese that focused on risk factors during HEMS were included. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, quality assessment and data extraction.
Results:
A total of 48 peer-reviewed studies were included. The results revealed that risk factors varied across man, machine, environment, management (MMEM) system. Patient factors included baseline characteristics, disease-related characteristics, demand for medical interventions, and special patient populations. Crew factors encompassed operational execution, decision-making judgement, physiological and psychological factors, and team collaboration. Machinery factors comprised medical equipment and consumables, mission support and service systems, and aircraft platforms and airworthiness. Environment factors included natural environment factors, environment temporal characteristics, aircraft environment factors, and ground environment factors. Management factors involved system, procedure, culture, resource allocation, team management, and technical support.
Conclusions:
The findings highlighted the multifaceted risk factors during HEMS transports. This synthesis underscores that effective risk mitigation requires a systematic approach addressing patient, crew, machinery, environment, and management elements. Future efforts should focus on developing individualized, patient-centered risk assessments tailored to specific acute conditions. Enhancing preparedness in these key areas is crucial for the early prevention of adverse events and for ultimately improving the safety and quality of care for HEMS.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Studies II: Thoracocentesis
Description
Excess pleural fluid or air may accumulate in some respiratory disorders in the thoracic cavity. To treat pleural effusion, a physician conducts thoracentesis by carefully piercing the chest wall and entering...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Respiratory Assessment: Purpose and Indications
Objectives and Importance:
The primary goal of respiratory assessment is to evaluate patients at early risk of clinical deterioration. Since respiratory distress often precedes other signs of declining health, breathing patterns and sounds become a...
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care