Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory01:29

Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

Attribution theory plays a crucial role in social psychology, helping to explain how individuals interpret the causes of behavior. One prominent model within this field is Harold Kelley's covariation theory, which provides a systematic approach to determining whether internal traits or external circumstances drive a person's actions. The model posits that individuals rely on three key types of information—consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness—to make these judgments.Consensus: Comparing...
Patient-centered Care01:13

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
Schemas01:42

Schemas

A schema is a mental construct consisting of a cluster or collection of related concepts (Bartlett, 1932). There are many different types of schemata, and they all have one thing in common: schemata are a method of organizing information that allows the brain to work more efficiently. When a schema is activated, the brain makes immediate assumptions about the person or object being observed.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Event-Driven Clinical Decision Support: Securing Medical Logic Through Structural Fault Isolation.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Beyond Forward Chaining: Logical Perspectives on Clinical Infection Monitoring of BSIs.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Ask Not What Your Server Can Do For You: A Fast Query Compatibility Strategy for Navigating FHIR Implementation Gaps.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Auto Ontology: Towards Automated Term-to-Concept Assignment in Microbiology Analytics.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Automated Differential Time to Positivity Analysis for CRBSIs Using Historical Microbiological Data.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026
Same author

Feasibility of Fuzzy Control Aggregation in Clinical Decision Support Using HL7 Arden Syntax.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 24, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Knowledge-Based Interpretation of Multi-Modal Clinical Findings: Evaluating a Local Agentic Bridge Between Worlds.

Leonhard Hauptfeld1, Moritz Grob1,2, Julia Liepold1,3

  • 1Medexter Healthcare, Borschkegasse 7/5, 1090 Vienna, Austria.

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics
|May 23, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Large language models (LLMs) show promise for interpreting unstructured clinical data for decision support systems. Lean LLMs accurately processed simple hepatitis serology data, but accuracy declined with complex parameters.

Keywords:
Arden SyntaxArdenSuiteClinical Decision SupportLarge Language Modelsknowledge-basedmulti-modal

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 24, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

Area of Science:

  • Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • Natural Language Processing

Background:

  • Clinical practice generates unstructured data (free-text reports, scans) that challenge automated interpretation by knowledge-based clinical decision support (CDS) systems.
  • Large language models (LLMs) offer potential for interpreting unstructured clinical data but face hurdles in accuracy, infrastructure, and data privacy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of various LLM sizes in interpreting complex medical data for CDS.
  • To assess LLM performance in calling specific medical logic modules for hepatitis serology interpretation from multi-modal inputs.

Main Methods:

  • A novel framework was used to test LLMs of different sizes.
  • LLMs were tasked with interpreting hepatitis serology data of varying complexity by calling Arden Syntax Medical Logic Modules.
  • Performance was evaluated based on the accuracy of parameter extraction and module invocation.

Main Results:

  • Computationally lean LLMs demonstrated high accuracy with low-complexity parameters, suggesting clinical feasibility for private CDS.
  • Accuracy significantly decreased when LLMs handled more numerous or complex quantitative parameters.
  • GPT-OSS, a lean LLM, showed promising results for specific, low-complexity interpretation tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Lean LLMs can achieve high accuracy for specific, low-complexity CDS tasks using unstructured multi-modal data.
  • Current LLM performance is limited by parameter complexity and quantity, requiring further development for comprehensive clinical decision support.
  • Integrating LLMs with CDS systems holds potential for improving automated interpretation of clinical data, provided accuracy challenges are addressed.