Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
Published on: January 27, 2010
Assessing Clinical Decision-Making Aided by a RAG-Based Dialog in Pre-Examination on Non-Odontogenic Tooth Pain
Takashi Yamamoto1, Keita Fukuyama1, Yukiko Mori1
1Medical Information Technology and Administration Planning, Kyoto University Hospital.
None:
Differentiating Non-Odontogenic Tooth Pain, a potential symptom of life-threatening conditions like Ischemic Heart Disease, is a critical challenge for dentists, as existing AI tools fail to support their decision-making. To address this, we developed a chatbot using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) enhanced Large Language Model (LLM). This study protocol outlines a trial to evaluate the impact of the AI's outputs on dentists' diagnostic accuracy. The study employs a three-arm, within-subjects crossover trial where 128 dentists evaluate simulated patient scenarios under three conditions: RAG, standalone LLM, and conventional interview via a novel Stepwise Information Disclosure Protocol, with diagnostic accuracy as the primary outcome. The findings will present a new framework for evaluating human-AI clinical interaction, with the potential to enhance patient safety by reducing missed diagnoses and unnecessary dental interventions.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Mouth
Mouth Inspection
The inspection begins with visually examining the mouth for symmetry, color, and size.
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
