Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 24, 2026

Assessing Specificity of Anticancer Drugs In Vitro
Published on: March 23, 2016
A real-world pharmacovigilance study of four anti-non-small cell lung cancer drugs using the WHO-VigiAccess database
Chunyue Fang1,2, Junzhu Wu1, Chouqi Hu1,2
1College of Pharmacy, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan, China.
Abstract:
The efficacy of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer is well established, but there are gaps in the safety evidence. This study used real-world data from the World Health Organization-VigiAccess database to evaluate the post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of these 4 drugs. ADRs data for anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib were collected from the VigiAccess database up to April 30, 2025. To identify and analyze potential ADR signals, the study employed the reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network methods. A total of 52,978 adverse event reports were collected for 4 medications, comprising 1642 reports for anlotinib, 10,294 for gefitinib, 12,493 for afatinib, and 28,549 for osimertinib. In the system organ class, all these 4 drugs are generally associated with skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders and gastrointestinal disorders. However, the focus of these 4 drugs varies. In the preferred term classification for specific symptoms, some adverse reactions have high frequency and strong signal intensity rankings, and others have high frequency but not particularly prominent signal intensity. The adverse reactions of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib share certain commonalities and characteristics, which are basically consistent with those described in the drug labels. However, there are also some specific ADRs. Clinically, personalized medication can be carried out based on the characteristics of the drugs and the patient's condition.
Insights
This study analyzed real-world adverse drug reactions for anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer. Findings reveal common and unique safety profiles, aiding personalized treatment strategies.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacovigilance
- Oncology
- Real-world evidence
Background:
- Established efficacy of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
- Gaps exist in the comprehensive safety evidence for these NSCLC treatments.
- Need for real-world data to understand post-marketing adverse drug reactions (ADRs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate post-marketing ADRs of anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib using real-world data.
- To identify and analyze potential ADR signals for these four NSCLC drugs.
- To compare the safety profiles and inform personalized treatment approaches.
Main Methods:
- Utilized World Health Organization-VigiAccess database for ADR data up to April 30, 2025.
- Employed statistical methods including reporting odds ratio, proportional reporting ratio, multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network.
- Analyzed 52,978 adverse event reports: 1642 for anlotinib, 10,294 for gefitinib, 12,493 for afatinib, and 28,549 for osimertinib.
Main Results:
- All four drugs are associated with skin/subcutaneous tissue and gastrointestinal disorders.
- Specific ADR profiles and signal intensities vary among the four medications.
- Identified commonalities and unique ADRs, largely consistent with drug labels but with notable differences.
Conclusions:
- Anlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, and osimertinib exhibit shared and distinct ADR profiles in NSCLC treatment.
- Real-world data analysis reveals safety signals that complement drug label information.
- Findings support personalized medication strategies based on drug-specific characteristics and patient conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers