Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 25, 2026

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
Published on: September 10, 2018
Stated preferences in the Iranian health system: a systematic review of discrete choice experiments and conjoint
Lucie Sabin1, Mohammad Hajizadeh2, Hassan Haghparast-Bidgoli1
1Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Background:
Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are increasingly used in health to determine preferences and inform policy decisions. However, questions remain about adherence to best practices and validity of the studies. To date, no systematic review has synthesised the application of DCEs in health in Iran. We conducted a systematic review to examine characteristics, methods, quality, and topics of DCEs in Iran.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were included if they collected participants' preferences for a health-related topic among relevant stakeholders using DCEs, conjoint analyses, or best-worst scaling. Data was extracted on study design, participants, attribute and choice set development, data collection, and estimation approaches. The quality of each study was assessed against good practice criteria.
Results:
Thirty studies met the eligibility criteria. The number of DCEs published increased from 2021 onwards. Most studies were conducted in urban areas, particularly in Tehran, the capital city, and focused on health services and workforce. Attributes were generally related to monetary, time, risk, or health outcomes. Pilot testing and qualitative work with target population to inform attribute selection and questionnaire design were conducted inconsistently. Nearly half of the studies used effective designs. However, reporting on key methodological elements such as software used, blocking, and opt-out options was often incomplete. Estimation approaches varied, with conditional logit models being most commonly used.
Conclusions:
This is the first systematic review of DCEs on health-related topics in Iran. Although the use of this method is expanding rapidly, gaps remain in questionnaire design, method reporting, and econometric modelling. Future DCEs would benefit from including more diverse populations, improving methodological rigour, and aligning objectives with target populations. Strengthening these aspects will improve the validity and policy relevance of DCEs in Iran.
Related Concept Videos
Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is limited...
Traditional Level Of Health Care System
The preventive healthcare service includes tests for screening. Preventive health care services include identifying and reducing disease risk...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Secondary Healthcare System
