Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Randomized Controlled Trial to Study the Acute Effects of Strength Exercise on Insulin Sensitivity in Obese Adults
Published on: December 1, 2023
Combining Treatment of Acute Malnutrition With Integrated Community Case Management: A Cluster-Randomised Controlled
Gael Cronin1, Mohamed Jelle1, Shukri Ali2
1UCL Institute for Global Health, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Insights
Integrated community case management (iCCM) shows potential for improving acute malnutrition treatment coverage in remote settings. However, challenges with diagnosis accuracy and relapse rates require further investigation and improved training for family health workers.
Area of Science:
- Global Health
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Public Health Interventions
Background:
- Acutely malnourished children in resource-limited settings face challenges in treatment access and outcomes.
- Integrated community case management (iCCM) programs offer a promising approach to address these challenges.
- Limited evidence exists on the effectiveness of integrating malnutrition treatment into iCCM.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of integrating malnutrition treatment into iCCM programs on treatment coverage and outcomes.
- To compare outcomes between standard iCCM and iCCM with community-level malnutrition treatment provided by family health workers (FHWs).
Main Methods:
- A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Somaliland, comparing standard iCCM with iCCM+ (malnutrition treatment at village level).
- Coverage was assessed via household cohorts, and treatment outcomes were monitored in an open cohort of identified cases.
- Malnutrition was diagnosed using mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and weight-for-height z-scores (WHZ).
Main Results:
- Prevalence of acute malnutrition was significantly lower when diagnosed by MUAC compared to WHZ (3% vs. 13%), leading to underpowering.
- While the intervention arm showed a higher likelihood of initiating treatment (71.9%), improvements in overall coverage were not statistically significant.
- Higher rates of relapse and non-response were observed in the intervention arm, alongside high rates of misdiagnosis by FHWs (67.4%-77.4%).
Conclusions:
- Integrating malnutrition treatment into iCCM may enhance treatment initiation in resource-limited settings.
- Significant challenges exist, including diagnostic accuracy and increased relapse/non-response rates, necessitating enhanced training and supervision for FHWs.
- Further research is needed to optimize the integration of malnutrition treatment within community-based health programs.
Abstract:
Achieving good treatment coverage and outcomes for acutely malnourished children is challenging in resource limited and remote settings. Inclusion of treatment within integrated community case management (iCCM) programmes has shown promise, but evidence is limited. We conducted a cluster randomised controlled trial in rural villages within the districts of Hargeisa, Gabiley, and Faraweyne in Somaliland. We compared treatment coverage and outcomes between 18 villages implementing iCCM, where cases of malnutrition (mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) < 12.5 cm and/or oedema) were referred to MCH clinics, and 19 villages implementing iCCM +, where malnutrition treatment was provided by family health workers (FHW) at village level. Coverage was measured in a closed household cohort at baseline and after 6 months of intervention. Treatment outcomes were determined in an open cohort of cases that were identified by the iCCM FHW and followed up on each month. The prevalence of acute malnutrition diagnosed using MUAC was four-fold lower compared to that diagnosed using weight-for-height z-scores (WHZ) (3% vs. 13%). This larger than expected difference resulted in the study being underpowered. Treatment coverage was 27% and 23% in the control and intervention arms at baseline and increased sharply in the intervention arm with an adjusted difference of 20 percentage points. However, the improvement was not statistically significant (adjusted OR 2.55 (95% CI 0.4, 18.8) p = 0.344). Cases were more likely to start treatment in the intervention arm (difference 71.9% (95% CI 58.1, 85.7) p < 0.001), but relapse and non-response were more frequent (p = 0.041 & p = 0.004). Over diagnosis of acute malnutrition by FHW was high, with 67.4% and 77.4% of cases being misdiagnosed in the control and intervention arm, respectively. While the integration of malnutrition treatment with iCCM shows potential for improving treatment coverage in some contexts, careful consideration should be given to the level of training and supervision required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN31437934. Registered 3/10/2023.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Chronic Pancreatitis II: Collaborative Care
Assessment: