Related Experiment Videos
Quality and performance of primary care for chronic conditions in Mendoza: population-based findings
Javier Roberti1,2, Agustina Mazzoni1, Marina Guglielmino1
1Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy, Buenos Aires, 1414, Argentina.
Introduction:
Chronic conditions (CC) require continuous, coordinated primary health care (PHC), yet Argentina's health system, including Mendoza province, remains fragmented across public, social security, and private subsectors. Evidence on how people with CC (PwCC) experience this fragmented system is limited. This study compared individuals with and without CC using the People's Voice Survey (PVS) in Mendoza.
Methods:
Cross-sectional, population-based telephone survey in Mendoza province (September-November 2022). From a random sample of 30 000 phone numbers, 1188 adults completed the survey. Weighted analyses compared PwCC and those without (non-PwCC) across domains of healthcare access, use, quality of care, user experience, and confidence in the system.
Results:
Of respondents, 41% reported ≥1 CC. PwCC had higher healthcare utilization (92.8% vs. 82.2% with ≥1 visit in the past year; P < .001) and were more likely to have a usual source of care (87.0% vs. 80.8%; P = .008), with a greater proportion attached to secondary-level facilities (42% vs. 35%; P < .05). Yet unmet need was also more prevalent among PwCC (22.8% vs. 17.5%; P = .046), driven primarily by long wait times. PwCC rated interpersonal dimensions of their most recent visit more favourably: clear communication (60.5% vs. 52.2%; P = .013), staff dedication (57.2% vs. 49.2%; P = .017), and kindness (56.9% vs. 49.8%; P = .035); yet more frequently reported a perceived medical error (84.3% vs 90.4% reporting no error; P = .003). Mental health needs were more prevalent among PwCC (17.5% vs. 11.6%; P = .007); more PwCC received mental healthcare in the past year (20.2% vs. 10.6%; P < .001), but the proportion with unmet mental health needs was similar across groups (P = .83). Cancer screening rates were similarly low across groups. Confidence in obtaining and affording good-quality care was low across both groups (31%-33%). Together, these patterns reveal a contact-quality-access paradox: greater system engagement and better-rated interpersonal care among PwCC coexist with greater unmet need, more perceived medical errors, and no advantage in financial confidence.
Conclusions:
Improving health system performance for PwCC requires addressing structural and interpersonal dimensions of care. Strengthening PHC as the foundation for CC management, integrating preventive and mental health services, and building mechanisms for accountability and public input are priority actions.
Related Concept Videos
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Secondary Healthcare System
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities