Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Technical Approach for Infrared Tracking for Soft Tissue Navigation with a Holographic Head-Mounted Display and Preclinical Validation
Published on: September 2, 2025
[Augmented reality in surgery for craniosynostosis in children]
L A Satanin1,2, A A Artemyev1, A N Konovalov1
1Burdenko Neurosurgical Center, Moscow, Russia.
This article reviews the use of augmented reality (AR) technology during surgery for children with craniosynostosis. By overlaying digital plans onto the patient in real time, surgeons can more accurately locate internal structures and guide bone reconstruction. The authors report that this approach improves surgical safety and precision, suggesting that AR will become an increasingly valuable tool in complex pediatric craniofacial procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric neurosurgery outcomes research within Augmented reality medicine
- Craniofacial reconstruction techniques
Background:
No prior work had resolved the specific clinical utility of digital overlay systems in pediatric craniofacial reconstruction. That uncertainty drove interest in how these tools might assist during complex bone reshaping procedures. Prior research has shown that traditional navigation methods often lack the real-time precision required for delicate pediatric anatomy. This gap motivated a closer look at how modern visualization platforms integrate into standard operating room workflows. It was already known that craniosynostosis presents unique challenges due to the rapid growth and fragile nature of the skull. That uncertainty drove the need for better intraoperative guidance to minimize risks during bone manipulation. No prior work had resolved whether these digital systems could reliably translate preoperative virtual models into physical surgical reality. This gap motivated the current assessment of how such technology performs in a clinical setting for young patients.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to clarify the clinical indications and technical capabilities of digital navigation systems in pediatric craniofacial surgery. Researchers sought to identify the specific advantages and disadvantages of using these tools during operations for craniosynostosis. The study addresses the need to understand how virtual planning translates into real-time intraoperative guidance. By examining nine consecutive cases, the authors intended to evaluate the practical utility of the technology in a clinical environment. The motivation for this work stems from the desire to improve the accuracy and safety of complex reconstructive procedures. The researchers also aimed to compare their observed findings with existing data from the broader scientific literature. This investigation focuses on how digital overlays assist surgeons in localizing intracranial structures and managing bone fragments. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of this emerging surgical technology.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved analyzing nine consecutive surgical cases performed at a specialized neurosurgery center in 2025. Researchers evaluated the integration of digital navigation systems during reconstructive interventions for pediatric patients. The study design focused on documenting the technical capabilities and clinical utility of the overlay platform. Investigators tracked the duration of preoperative virtual planning to understand the preparation requirements for each case. The team also recorded the time spent using the navigation system during the actual operation. Reviewers compared these observations against existing literature to identify advantages and limitations of the method. The approach prioritized the assessment of how well the digital models aligned with the physical surgical field. Finally, the team examined the system's ability to guide specific tasks like craniotomy line marking and distraction device placement.
Main Results:
The strongest finding from the literature indicates that the navigation system successfully enables real-time guidance during complex reconstructive procedures. The researchers documented an average preoperative modeling time of 173.3 minutes, with a range of 90 to 240 minutes. Intraoperative navigation added an average of 33.9 minutes to the surgical duration, ranging from 15 to 60 minutes. The data shows that the system allows for the accurate localization of critical intracranial structures, including venous sinuses and endostoses. The authors report that this visualization capability significantly enhances the safety profile of the surgery. The findings demonstrate that the technology is effective for marking craniotomy lines and controlling the position of bone fragments. The results confirm that the final reconstruction consistently conforms to the initial virtual plan. These findings suggest that the integration of digital overlays provides a reliable method for improving surgical precision in pediatric cases.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that this digital visualization platform offers a promising future for pediatric cranial reconstruction. This synthesis suggests that real-time guidance enhances the predictability of complex bone reshaping tasks. The researchers note that the system effectively bridges the gap between virtual planning and physical execution. Their review indicates that improved localization of intracranial structures contributes to a safer surgical environment. The authors emphasize that continued refinement of these digital tools will likely yield better patient outcomes over time. This synthesis highlights that the technology provides a reliable method for verifying the final position of bone fragments. The researchers suggest that the integration of these systems makes reconstructive procedures more precise than traditional methods alone. The authors conclude that further adoption of these techniques will refine the standard of care for children with skull deformities.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers propose that the system enables real-time intraoperative neuronavigation by overlaying virtual plans onto the patient. This mechanism allows surgeons to precisely localize intracranial structures, such as venous sinuses and endostoses, which are otherwise difficult to identify during standard procedures.
The authors utilized a specialized navigation platform that integrates preoperative virtual modeling with real-time surgical guidance. This tool allows for the marking of craniotomy lines and the assessment of bone fragment alignment against the initial digital plan.
The researchers state that the system is necessary for visualizing hidden intracranial structures. Without this digital overlay, identifying venous sinuses and endostoses during the operation is significantly more challenging, increasing the risk of complications compared to traditional visual inspection.
The authors report that preoperative modeling requires an average of 173.3 minutes, while the intraoperative navigation phase adds approximately 33.9 minutes to the total surgery time. This data type helps quantify the efficiency of the digital workflow.
The researchers measured the conformity of the final reconstruction against the preoperative plan. They observed that the system allows for the precise control of distraction device positioning, ensuring the physical outcome matches the digital simulation.
The authors propose that the ongoing development of these digital techniques will make results more predictable and safe. They suggest that future iterations of the technology will further improve clinical outcomes compared to current non-augmented surgical standards.

