Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quantifying Work02:30

Quantifying Work

As a system undergoes a change, its internal energy can change, and energy can be transferred from the system to the surroundings, or from the surroundings to the system.
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...
Social Exchange Theory01:26

Social Exchange Theory

As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
Equity Theory01:26

Equity Theory

Equity theory explains how our sense of fairness influences the dynamics of close relationships. Rooted in social psychology, the theory posits that individuals evaluate fairness by comparing the ratio of their contributions to the rewards they receive. Relationship satisfaction is highest when these ratios are perceived as balanced between partners, promoting mutual reciprocity and a sense of justice.Equity vs. Equality in RelationshipsEquity is distinct from equality. Fairness does not...
Work01:14

Work

Work is a fundamental concept of mechanical engineering and has many applications. Understanding how work is calculated and the different types of work can help us better understand physical processes and provide insights into complex problems.
Work is defined as the result of a force acting on an object, causing it to move along the line of action of force. It is also defined as the process of transferring energy through the application of force on an object, resulting in its displacement.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The maintenance of ambiguity in Martian exobiology.

Social studies of science·2022
Same author

When funding fails: Planetary exploration at NASA in an era of austerity, 1967-1976.

Social studies of science·2021
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Money-Work: Science Funding as Relational Socioeconomics.

Janet Vertesi1, David Reinecke2

  • 1Sociology Department, Princeton University, NJ, USA.

Social Studies of Science
|May 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Scientists spend significant time on funding acquisition and management, termed "money-work." This study reveals the intricate, everyday economic activities embedded within scientific research, challenging the separation of science and finance.

Keywords:
fundingmoneypolitical economyrelational worksocioeconomics

More Related Videos

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
11:51

Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making

Published on: March 2, 2011

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats
15:01

Peering into the Dynamics of Social Interactions: Measuring Play Fighting in Rats

Published on: January 18, 2013

Area of Science:

  • Sociology of Science
  • Science Funding Studies
  • Economic Sociology

Background:

  • Scientific work accounts often neglect the substantial effort scientists dedicate to funding.
  • Existing research on scientific funding primarily uses political, economic, historical, or policy perspectives.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and explore the concept of 'money-work' in scientific research.
  • To analyze the everyday practical work, action, and interaction related to funding acquisition, management, and dispersal by scientists.
  • To investigate the intimate connection between science and money in contemporary laboratory settings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing a relational socioeconomic approach.
  • Conducting ethnographic studies directly at the laboratory bench.
  • Applying Zelizerian concepts such as earmarking, making good matches, and developing valuation criteria.

Main Results:

  • Scientists engage in 'money-work,' mundane yet crucial economic activities intertwined with scientific endeavors.
  • The study demonstrates that science and money are not separate but intimately connected in practice.
  • Identified specific mechanisms like earmarking and valuation criteria used by scientists in financial dealings.

Conclusions:

  • A new framework for laboratory ethnography is proposed, highlighting the political economy of science funding.
  • Understanding the relational work, currency fluctuation, and valuation in science funding is crucial for future scholarship.
  • This perspective is essential for navigating the current crisis in science funding and for the next generation of science studies.