Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

10:16
Protocol for Microplastics Sampling on the Sea Surface and Sample Analysis
Published on: December 16, 2016
Microplastic prevalence in commercially available petfoods
Emily Thrift1, Tamara Galloway2, David Santillo3
1School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Sussex, United Kingdom.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
|May 25, 2026
Summary
Microplastics are present in 76% of tested pet and wildlife foods, indicating a significant contamination route into terrestrial ecosystems. This study highlights a previously unrecognized pathway for microplastics entering food chains.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Ecotoxicology
- Food Safety
Background:
- Microplastic contamination is a growing concern, with human food sources investigated, but pet and wildlife foods remain understudied.
- Pet and wildlife foods could serve as a significant pathway for microplastic entry into terrestrial ecosystems via animal consumption and excretion.
- Understanding microplastic presence in animal diets is crucial for assessing ecological and potential health risks.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the prevalence and concentration of microplastics in commercially available pet and wildlife foods in the UK.
- To identify common polymer types found in contaminated food products.
- To assess the potential risk of microplastic ingestion for pets and wild mammals and their subsequent environmental impact.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 38 different pet and hedgehog food products (dry and wet) from the UK market.
- Testing of six 1g replicates per product, totaling 228 samples.
- Identification and quantification of microplastics using established laboratory methods.
Main Results:
- Microplastics were detected in 76% of the 38 food products tested, with 27.6% of all samples being positive.
- Value-brand products showed a higher prevalence of microplastic contamination compared to mid-range and premium options.
- Common polymers identified include polyester, polyacrylamide, polyethylene, and polypropylene, with wet foods posing a higher ingestion risk due to consumption volume.
Conclusions:
- Pet and wildlife foods represent a significant, previously unrecognized source of microplastic contamination.
- The high prevalence of microplastics in these foods suggests an important pathway for entry into terrestrial food chains.
- Further research is needed to understand the long-term ecological and health implications of microplastic ingestion by pets and wildlife.

