Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Add-on parsaclisib for patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal response to ruxolitinib: a randomized phase 3 study
Jean-Jacques Kiladjian1, Uma Borate2, Elisabetta Abruzzese3
1Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris Cité University, INSERM, Paris 75010, France.
Background:
Ruxolitinib (JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor) is indicated for adults with intermediate or high-risk myelofibrosis; however, a subset of patients may exhibit a suboptimal response due to persistent PI3K/AKT activation. The phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled LIMBER-304 study (NCT04551053) investigated the efficacy and safety of add-on parsaclisib (highly selective PI3Kδ inhibitor) in patients with myelofibrosis and suboptimal or declining response to stable ruxolitinib monotherapy.
Patients And Methods:
Adults with primary or secondary myelofibrosis who received ruxolitinib with palpable spleen and Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF) total symptom score (TSS) ≥10 were eligible. Primary end point was proportion of patients achieving ≥25% spleen volume reduction (SVR; baseline to week 24); key secondary end point was proportion of patients with ≥50% MFSAF-TSS reduction (baseline to week 24).
Results:
In total, 90 patients received parsaclisib/ruxolitinib; 87 received placebo/ruxolitinib. At week 24, 16.7% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib achieved ≥25% SVR vs 9.7% for placebo/ruxolitinib; this difference was not statistically significant. By week 24, ≥50% reduction in MFSAF-TSS was observed in 17.1% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 14.1% for placebo/ruxolitinib. Higher rates of infections (including cytomegalovirus) and gastrointestinal disorders were observed with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 60.0% of patients receiving parsaclisib/ruxolitinib vs 42.5% with placebo/ruxolitinib. The study was terminated early based on efficacy findings.
Conclusions:
Study results suggested adding parsaclisib to stable-dose ruxolitinib was unlikely to offer clinically meaningful benefits. Further research is needed on the potential of JAK and PI3K inhibitor-based combination therapy for patients with myelofibrosis.
Insights
Adding parsaclisib to ruxolitinib did not significantly improve outcomes for myelofibrosis patients, showing no meaningful clinical benefit. Further research into combination therapies is warranted for this patient population.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Myelofibrosis is a serious condition often treated with ruxolitinib, a JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor.
- Some patients do not respond well to ruxolitinib due to persistent PI3K/AKT pathway activation.
- Parsaclisib, a PI3Kδ inhibitor, was investigated as an add-on therapy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding parsaclisib to ruxolitinib in myelofibrosis patients with suboptimal response.
- To assess spleen volume reduction and symptom score changes in patients receiving the combination therapy versus placebo.
Main Methods:
- A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (LIMBER-304) was conducted.
- Eligible patients had primary or secondary myelofibrosis, received ruxolitinib, had a palpable spleen, and a high symptom score (MFSAF TSS ≥10).
- Primary endpoint was spleen volume reduction (≥25%) at 24 weeks; key secondary endpoint was symptom score reduction (≥50%).
Main Results:
- 16.7% of patients on parsaclisib/ruxolitinib achieved ≥25% spleen volume reduction versus 9.7% on placebo/ruxolitinib (not statistically significant).
- ≥50% reduction in total symptom score was observed in 17.1% with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib versus 14.1% with placebo/ruxolitinib.
- Higher rates of infections and gastrointestinal disorders were noted with parsaclisib/ruxolitinib, and the study was terminated early due to efficacy findings.
Conclusions:
- Adding parsaclisib to stable ruxolitinib therapy is unlikely to provide significant clinical benefits for myelofibrosis patients.
- The combination therapy showed increased adverse events, including serious infections.
- Further investigation into JAK and PI3K inhibitor combinations is needed for effective myelofibrosis treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Immunomodulatory Agents
Drugs for Treatment of Crohn's Disease in IBD Using Biologic Agents: Anti-TNF