Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts
Published on: September 20, 2018
Clinical spectrum of pediatric-onset Erdheim-Chester disease: insights from a single-center case series
Ying Yang1, Zi-Chao Lyu1, Zheng-Zheng Liu2
1Department of Pediatrics, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Purpose:
Pediatric-onset Erdheim-Chester disease (PECD) is considerably rarer than the adult-onset Erdheim-Chester disease (AECD). This study aimed to characterize the clinical, laboratory, imaging, and outcome features of PECD and to compare similarities and differences with adult-onset cases treated at the same center.
Methods:
We performed a comparative analysis of PECD and AECD patients treated at the same center over the same period, examining differences in clinical presentation, laboratory and imaging findings, treatment responses, and outcomes.
Results:
Five pediatric and sixty-seven adult patients were included. Central nervous system and hypothalamic or pituitary involvement were observed in over 50% of children. PECD patients demonstrated distinct organ involvement patterns, including lower rates of bone involvement (60.0% vs. 97.0%; P = 0.022) and cardiac or large-vessel involvement (0% vs. 65.7%; P = 0.007) compared with AECD patients. Analysis of skeletal manifestations revealed significantly less appendicular skeleton involvement in children [1/3 (33.3%) vs. 64/65 (98.5%); P = 0.004]. Osteosclerosis was the predominant radiographic pattern in both groups (66.7% in children vs. 83.9% in adults; P = 0.505), while osteolytic lesions were present in roughly one-third of patients in each cohort. Inflammatory markers were significantly lower in the pediatric group (P < 0.05). PECD patients exhibited trends toward higher progression-free survival (80.0% vs. 35.0%; P = 0.196) and overall survival (100% vs. 80.5%; P = 0.382) compared with adults; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the extremely small pediatric sample size.
Conclusions:
PECD and AECD differ in clinical manifestations and the intensity of systemic inflammation. Pediatric patients appear to have more favorable survival outcomes. These findings suggest potential age-related differences in disease presentation and inflammatory burden. Nevertheless, validation in larger multicenter cohorts is required, underscoring the necessity for large-scale, multicenter collaborative investigations to inform the development of pediatric-specific management strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Bacterial Gastroenteritis
Chronic Kidney Disease II: Clinical Manifestations
