Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026
Preoxygenation Techniques for Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults Utilizing Oxygen Mask and Noninvasive Ventilation
Published on: December 5, 2025
Performance of the Ventilatory Ratio to Predict Intubation in Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress
Antoine Goury1,2, Zoubir Djerada2, Guillaume Thery1,2
1CHU Reims, Unité de Médecine Intensive et Réanimation Polyvalente, Reims, France.
Objectives:
Ventilatory ratio (VR) could be a useful marker of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) worsening, since its value has been shown to correlate with dead space and severity of non-COVID-19 ARDS. In this study, we sought to: 1) compare VR to the estimated intrapulmonary shunt and the Pao2/Fio2 ratio for the association with the risk of intubation and 2) define the best VR threshold to discriminate between intubated patients and nonintubated patients.
Design:
Multicenter, prospective experimental study.
Setting:
ICUs from University and General Hospitals.
Patients:
Patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 ARDS.
Interventions:
We conducted standardized continuous positive airway pressure sessions with an Fio2 of 100% and positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H2O to calculate the Pao2/Fio2 ratio, the estimated intrapulmonary shunt (indexed on cardiac output), and VR. These sessions were repeated until intubation or ICU discharge. A time-dependent joint multivariable model was performed.
Measurements And Main Results:
Fifty-two patients were included, 25 of whom required intubation (48%). Among studied variables including the Pao2/Fio2 ratio and the estimated intrapulmonary shunt, VR was most associated with the longitudinal risk of intubation with a hazard ratio (HR, 3.30; 97.5% CI, 1.42-8.91; p = 0.001) compare to the Pao2/Fio2 ratio with HR (0.98; 97.5% CI, 0.97-0.99; p = 0.002) and the estimated intrapulmonary shunt with HR (2.31; 97.5% CI, 0.37-24.01; p = 0.394). The best VR threshold values were identified at day 1 (VR = 2.1, sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 60.1%; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.810), day 3 (VR = 2.3; sensitivity, 92.0%; specificity, 91.2%; AUC = 0.973), and day 5 (VR = 2; sensitivity, 92%; specificity, 97%; AUC = 0.979) to discriminate intubated and nonintubated patients.
Conclusions:
The study provides valuable insights into COVID-19 ARDS, highlighting VR as a reliable and objective predictor of intubation. Increased VR could be a critical marker of lung injury progression in patients with ARDS.
Related Concept Videos
01:20Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
01:29Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
01:21Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
01:29Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
01:23Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
01:29Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings