Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 26, 2026

Predictive Immune Modeling of Solid Tumors
Published on: February 25, 2020
Prediction Error in Quality-Adjusted Life Years in Economic Evaluations of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Comparison
Jinyu Chen1, Yichen Zhang1, Kexin Han1
1Department of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University, 38 Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Background:
Survival data from pivotal clinical trials are critical for estimating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). However, immature survival data require extrapolation beyond observed follow-up to project outcomes, introducing potential prediction error into QALY estimates used in economic evaluations. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) present unique extrapolation challenges due to delayed responses and extended survival benefits. We therefore quantify the QALY prediction error of early extrapolations by benchmarking them against updated follow-up at a common time horizon.
Methods:
Using reconstructed individual patient data derived from published Kaplan-Meier curves of pivotal trials, this study assessed the accuracy of early survival extrapolations for ICIs approved in China by comparing early projections with QALYs obtained from updated data at the same horizon. A partitioned-survival framework using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) informed state occupancy, and QALYs were obtained via restricted mean survival time (RMST) integration of health-state utilities at the target horizon. Statistical analyses evaluated bias, precision, and agreement between extrapolated and updated QALY estimates. Linear regression and sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of target extrapolation horizon (T) on prediction error.
Results:
In total, 14 randomized controlled trials (4839 patients) were included for analysis. The mean deviation between extrapolated and observed QALYs was - 0.01 (95% CI - 0.03 to 0.01), with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.04). Strong agreement existed between extrapolated and updated QALYs (Spearman's ρ = 0.98, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.99, P < 0.001). Consistently, OS extrapolations showed minimal deviation (MAE: 0.56 months), while PFS tended to be underestimated (MAE: 1.91 months). Moreover, predictive error increased significantly with longer extrapolation periods for QALY (MAE increase: 0.011 QALY/year, P = 0.004) and OS (MAE increase: 0.342 months/year, P = 0.010).
Conclusions:
Near-horizon QALY prediction error was modest on average but increased with longer target extrapolation horizons. These findings support transparent reporting of extrapolation uncertainty and suggest that structured evidence reassessment may be particularly valuable as longer follow-up becomes available.
Related Concept Videos
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Assumptions of Survival Analysis