Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation01:20

Overview Of Cell Separation And Isolation

Cell separation was first achieved in 1964 by S. H. Seal, who separated large tumor cells from the smaller blood cells using filtration. Two years later, Pohl and Hawk performed experiments on how cells respond differently to a nonuniform electric field based on the cell type. Such observations were the inception of cell separation methods, which allow isolating a single cell type from a heterogeneous sample.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Copper-Iron Cell Death Axis: Mechanistic Crosstalk, Disease Implications and an Integrated Metallo-Redox-Metabolic Framework.

International journal of biological sciences·2026
Same author

ATPase-based implementation of enforced ATP wasting in Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved ethanol production.

Biotechnology for biofuels·2020
Same author

Evaluation of pyruvate decarboxylase-negative <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> strains for the production of succinic acid.

Engineering in life sciences·2020
Same author

Broadening the Scope of Enforced ATP Wasting as a Tool for Metabolic Engineering in Escherichia coli.

Biotechnology journal·2019
Same author

Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum aimed at alternative carbon sources and new products.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2014
Same author

Metabolic engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for glycolate production.

Journal of biotechnology·2014
Same journal

Literature-informed gene extraction and ranking for multimodal data fusion.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

SA-MTP: a structure-aware framework for multifunctional therapeutic peptide annotation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Genome assemblies and annotations are not static and need support for tracking their evolution.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

A historical journey of metabolite-protein interaction discovery: from data harmonization to AI-driven prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Bridging local-global transmembrane protein contexts with contrastive pretraining for alignment-free pathogenicity prediction.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same journal

Prediction of drug hypersensitivity by comprehensive modeling of HLA-peptidomes.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 26, 2026

A Versatile Pipeline for Analyzing Dynamic Changes in Nuclear Bodies in a Variety of Cell Types
06:33

A Versatile Pipeline for Analyzing Dynamic Changes in Nuclear Bodies in a Variety of Cell Types

Published on: June 28, 2024

Rethinking bioinformatics in liquid-liquid phase separation: data resources, predictive models, and an event-centric

Zi-Long Yuan1, Bo Wang1, Yu-Lu Chen2

  • 1School of Medical Technology and Information Engineering, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, 548 Binwen Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou 310053, Zhejiang, China.

Briefings in Bioinformatics
|May 25, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is key to cell compartments and disease. This review synthesizes LLPS bioinformatics resources and models, finding a need for event-centric frameworks for better understanding.

Keywords:
LLPS eventsbioinformaticsdatabaseliquid–liquid phase separationpredictive model

More Related Videos

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 26, 2026

A Versatile Pipeline for Analyzing Dynamic Changes in Nuclear Bodies in a Variety of Cell Types
06:33

A Versatile Pipeline for Analyzing Dynamic Changes in Nuclear Bodies in a Variety of Cell Types

Published on: June 28, 2024

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification
10:37

Deep Proteome Profiling by Isobaric Labeling, Extensive Liquid Chromatography, Mass Spectrometry, and Software-assisted Quantification

Published on: November 15, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
  • Computational Biology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is crucial for forming membraneless cellular compartments and regulating physiological processes.
  • LLPS is increasingly linked to various diseases, driving research in experimental and computational approaches.
  • Bioinformatics resources and computational models for LLPS have grown but remain fragmented.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive synthesis of current bioinformatics resources and predictive modeling approaches for LLPS.
  • To critically examine and compare major LLPS databases and computational models.
  • To identify limitations and propose future directions for LLPS research.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review and critical synthesis of existing LLPS bioinformatics databases.
  • Survey and comparison of over 40 computational models for LLPS prediction, including machine learning and deep learning frameworks.
  • Analysis of data abstractions and methodological evolution in LLPS modeling.

Main Results:

  • Major LLPS databases exhibit inconsistencies in evidence types, curation, and coverage, hindering integrative analysis.
  • Computational models for LLPS prediction show evolution from classical machine learning to advanced deep learning and large language models.
  • A fundamental mismatch exists between molecule-centric data and the multicomponent, context-dependent nature of LLPS.

Conclusions:

  • Future LLPS research requires a shift towards event-centric frameworks to capture molecular assemblies, context, and phase behaviors.
  • Event-centric frameworks can provide a coherent foundation for next-generation LLPS datasets and models.
  • Improved mechanistic interpretability and translational relevance are expected from event-centric approaches in LLPS research.