Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026
Minimally Invasive Treatment for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture Using Sagittal Alignment Screws and A Trauma Reduction Device
Published on: November 8, 2024
Comparative Outcomes of Surgical Versus Conservative Management for C2 Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Systematic
Omar Al-Mahrouqi1, Eman B A Musilhi2, Fatma H AlShuhoumi3
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat.
Study Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative outcomes.
Objective:
To evaluate the effectiveness of surgical versus conservative management for C2 fractures in patients aged 60 years or older.
Summary Of Background Data:
C2 fractures are common cervical spine injuries in elderly populations, with ongoing debate regarding optimal management strategies. Previous studies have reported conflicting outcomes regarding fracture healing, stability, and mortality between treatment approaches.
Methods:
Following PRISMA guidelines, we analysed 102 studies (84,366 patients). Primary functional outcomes included the Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale pain score. Secondary outcomes comprised fracture stability, union rates, complications, and mortality (30 d, 3 mo, and 1 y).
Results:
Surgical management demonstrated superior fracture union (82.75% vs. 43.95%, P<0.001) and stability rates (86.40% vs. 72.02%, P<0.001) compared with conservative treatment. Pneumonia was the most common complication (surgical: 4.60%; conservative: 2.94%). Surgical patients had significantly lower mortality rates at 30 days (7.72% vs. 21.86%), 3 months (10.97% vs. 21.09%), and 1 year (28.08% vs. 31.57%) (all P<0.001).
Conclusions:
Surgical treatment for C2 fractures in elderly patients is associated with improved fracture healing, stability, and reduced mortality compared with conservative management. Treatment decisions should consider individual patient risk factors and surgical suitability.