Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transformers with Off-Nominal Turns Ratios01:25

Transformers with Off-Nominal Turns Ratios

In scenarios involving parallel transformers with disparate ratings, developing per-unit models requires accommodating off-nominal turns ratios. This situation arises when the selected base voltages are not proportional to the transformer’s voltage ratings. Consider a transformer where the rated voltages are related by the term a. If the chosen voltage bases satisfy a relationship involving term b, term c is defined as the ratio of these bases. This ratio is then substituted into the rated...
Transformers01:26

Transformers

A device that transforms voltages from one value to another using induction is called a transformer. A transformer consists of two separate coils, or windings, wrapped around the same soft iron core. However, they are electrically insulated from each other.
The iron core has a substantial relative permeability. Therefore, the magnetic field lines generated due to the current in one winding are almost entirely confined within the core, such that the same magnetic flux permeates each turn of both...
Three-Winding Transformers01:19

Three-Winding Transformers

Three identical single-phase transformers can be configured to form a three-phase transformer connection, which involves high-voltage and low-voltage windings. The high-voltage windings are denoted by capital letters A-B-C, while the low-voltage windings are labeled with lowercase letters a-b-c, representing their respective phases. This notation helps distinguish between the high and low voltage sides of the transformer.
In the per-unit equivalent circuit of a grounded Y-Y three-phase...
Energy Losses in Transformers01:21

Energy Losses in Transformers

In an ideal transformer, it is assumed that there are no energy losses, and, hence, all the power at the primary winding is transferred to the secondary winding. However, in reality,  the transformers always have some energy losses, and, hence, the output power obtained at the secondary winding is less than the input power at the primary winding due to energy losses.
There are four main reasons for energy losses in transformers.
The first cause can be  the high resistance of the copper windings...
Types Of Transformers01:16

Types Of Transformers

Transformers can provide desired voltages to a circuit by modifying the number of turns in the secondary windings.
If the ratio of the number of turns in the secondary winding to that of the primary winding is greater than one, then the transformer is said to be a step-up transformer. In a step-up transformer, the voltage at the secondary winding is greater than the voltage applied at the primary winding.
However, if this ratio is less than one, the transformer is said to be a step-down...
The Ideal Transformer01:26

The Ideal Transformer

In single-phase two-winding transformers, two windings are coiled around a magnetic core characterized by cross-sectional area A and magnetic permeability μ. A phasor current i1 enters the left winding while i2 exits the right winding, establishing the fundamental working of the transformer through electromagnetic principles.
Ampere's Law forms the basis of understanding the magnetic field within the transformer. It states that the integral of the magnetic field intensity's tangential component...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Characteristic Profiling of Soluble Factors in the Cerebrospinal Fluid of Patients With Neurosyphilis.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2024
Same author

Constructing Heavy-Atom-Free Photosensitizers for Hypoxic Tumor Phototherapy Based on Donor-Excited Photoinduced Electron-Transfer-Driven Type-I and Type-II Mechanisms.

ACS applied materials & interfaces·2024
Same author

Engineering mouse cell fate controller by rational design.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Case report: A rare case of hereditary hemochromatosis caused by a mutation in the HAMP gene in Fuyang, China.

Frontiers in medicine·2024
Same author

Perioperative liberal drinking management promotes postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery after gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A randomized controlled trial.

Journal of clinical anesthesia·2024
Same author

Evaluation of normalization methods for predicting quantitative phenotypes in metagenomic data analysis.

Frontiers in genetics·2024

Related Experiment Videos

Predicting fire consequences with the transformer model based on multimodal feature fusion.

Yilin Wang1, Beibei Wang2, Xiaolu Wang3

  • 1College of Jilin Emergency Management, Changchun Institute of Technology, Changchun, 130012, China.

Journal of Cheminformatics
|May 26, 2026
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a Transformer-based deep learning model for predicting fire radiation distances, improving chemical process safety. The model integrates molecular data and process conditions for accurate hazard assessment.

Keywords:
3D molecular structureConsequences of chemical fire accidentsMulti-encoder transformer structureMultimodal feature fusionSMILES

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Process Safety Engineering
  • Chemical Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry

Background:

  • Traditional fire consequence models struggle to balance accuracy and computational efficiency.
  • Accurate prediction of fire radiation distances is crucial for process safety management and risk assessment in the chemical industry.
  • Existing methods often fail to capture the complex relationship between molecular properties and fire behavior.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a high-precision Transformer-based prediction model for estimating fire radiation effect distance.
  • To integrate multimodal data, including molecular structure and process parameters, for enhanced hazard prediction.
  • To provide a reliable and interpretable tool for industrial hazard assessment and safety design.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a multimodal feature fusion approach using SMILES encoding, molecular descriptors, and 3D molecular structures.
  • Utilized a Transformer deep learning architecture for prediction.
  • Generated a dataset using PHAST software simulations for 40 flammable chemicals under diverse release scenarios.
  • Employed SHAP analysis for model interpretability.

Main Results:

  • The Transformer model achieved a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.98, a 15% improvement over the random forest benchmark.
  • Achieved low regression errors: MSE of 0.0082, RMSE of 0.0959, and MAE of 0.0047.
  • SHAP analysis confirmed model decisions align with safety principles, identifying leak size and pressure as key hazard drivers.

Conclusions:

  • The Transformer-based model offers an optimal balance between computational performance and prediction accuracy for fire consequence modeling.
  • This deep learning framework provides a reliable, accurate, and interpretable tool for enhancing industrial hazard assessment and safety planning.
  • The study demonstrates the transformative potential of deep learning in advancing chemical safety practices.