Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Manual Dexterity in Non-Human Primates
Published on: November 11, 2011
Initial assessment of a species-specific rebound measurement mode for non-human primates
Yingbo Liu1, Yunhao Su1, Kaiming Zhang2
1The School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, China.
Background:
Accurate measurement of intraocular pressure in non-human primates is of significant importance in veterinary clinical practice, particularly for the prevention, detection, and management of glaucoma in non-human primates. However, no veterinary tonometer is currently designed specifically for non-human primates.
Objective:
To investigate the accuracy of the macaque-specific measurement mode of the iFalcon™ V100 rebound tonometer.
Methods:
IOP was increased stepwise from 5 mmHg to 90 mmHg in 3-5 mmHg increments. At each target pressure, the system was stabilized for 10 s, then the iFalcon™ V100 recorded six consecutive rebound readings and their average. Each step yielded 2-3 such average values. The results were compared with a high-precision invasive pressure sensor. Linear regression and Bland-Altman analyses were performed, and the measurement range was stratified (5-30, 30-60, 60-90 mmHg) for refined assessment.
Results:
The iFalcon™ V100 showed strong positive correlation with the invasive sensor (y = 0.99x + 0.42, R² = 0.99). The mean difference was - 0.036 mmHg (95% limits of agreement: -3.747 to 3.675 mmHg). Within the 5-30 mmHg range, agreement was excellent (mean difference: -0.063 mmHg). Acceptable agreement was maintained up to 90 mmHg.
Conclusions:
This ex vivo study provides an initial assessment of the iFalcon™ V100 rebound tonometer in non-human primate eyes. The device showed good correlation and agreement with an invasive pressure sensor across a wide pressure range. While the sample size was limited, these preliminary findings support the potential of this species-specific measurement mode for IOP assessment in non-human primate research. Further studies with more eyes and in vivo conditions are needed to confirm its reliability and repeatability.

