Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

A Standardized Obstacle Course for Assessment of Visual Function in Ultra Low Vision and Artificial Vision
Published on: February 11, 2014
Barriers and enablers to low vision service delivery: a systematic review informed by the Theoretical Domains
Rajendra Gyawali1, Jeewanand Bist2, Himal Kandel3
1Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Clinical Relevance:
Understanding barriers and enablers to low vision service delivery, particularly through a theoretical lens, offers optometrists and other eyecare practitioners insights to improve access and outcomes in vision rehabilitation.
Background:
Vision impairment impacts daily functioning, quality of life, and social participation. Low vision rehabilitation services can enhance independence and well-being, yet few eyecare practitioners provide them, limiting access for those in need. This systematic review aimed to synthesise healthcare provider-perceived barriers and enablers to low vision service delivery across the world, using a theory-informed approach.
Methods:
Five online databases were searched for empirical studies on barriers and enablers to low vision services. Pairs of reviewers independently screened studies against inclusion/exclusion criteria and assessed quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Data extracted included participant quotes, themes, statistical analyses, and author interpretations. A combined inductive-deductive analysis was conducted, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework. The review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023439041).
Results:
This review included sixteen studies capturing perspectives from 2,918 low vision professionals. Common barriers included limited access to devices/services (reported in n = 14 studies), poor practitioner knowledge (n = 13), patient-related factors (n = 12), care process limitations (n = 11), and resource/workload issues (n = 11). Key enablers were enhancing practitioner knowledge/skills (n = 6) through education/training (n = 5) and improving the availability of devices and services (n = 5). These barriers and enablers were related to theoretical domains of environmental context/resources (n = 15), knowledge/skills (n = 14), and beliefs about consequences (n = 12). Improvement recommendations included practitioner training, patient awareness, improved service availability, and revised care models, which map to the intervention functions of education and training, environmental restructuring, enablement, persuasion, and incentivisation.
Conclusion:
Low vision rehabilitation service delivery is influenced by practitioner capacity, motivation, and the surrounding social and practice environment. Addressing these influences through targeted, theory-based interventions that are tailored to the local context may enhance service delivery and ultimately improve patient access to rehabilitation.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this barrier...
Photoreceptors and Visual Pathways
Physiological Barriers
The blood endothelial barrier is the most porous of these. It allows all small ionized, un-ionized, and lipophilic molecules to pass through the endothelial lining into the interstitial space...
Glaucoma: Overview
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...

