Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 27, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Healthcare professionals' perceptions of the acceptability of the PREVENT-PE trial: A mixed-methods survey and
Angel Leung1, James Goadsby1,2, Kayleigh S Sheen2,3
1Harris Birthright Research Centre for Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Introduction:
There is a lack of published data on how healthcare professionals perceive the acceptability of third-trimester risk screening in pregnancy. The PREVENT-PE trial [ISRCTN41632964] demonstrated that a personalized approach to term pre-eclampsia risk assessment to inform risk-stratified timed birth at term reduced the incidence of term PE by 30%, without increasing Cesarean birth or neonatal morbidity. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability of the PREVENT-PE trial among healthcare professionals.
Material And Methods:
Staff were invited to an online survey comprising validated metrics of acceptability, which were analyzed descriptively. Also, the staff were invited to one-to-one interviews to probe the acceptability of the trial in more depth. Using template analysis, responses were mapped onto the following domains of acceptability: Sense-making (Intervention Coherence), Commitment (Affective Attitude), Change (Burden), Communication (Ethicality), Motivation (Opportunity Costs), Action (Self-Efficacy), and Evaluation (Perceived Effectiveness).
Results:
There were 65 completed surveys, whilst 19 healthcare professionals participated in interviews. Forty-one staff participants were from King's College Hospital, and twenty-one staff participants were from Medway Maritime Hospital, in line with the recruitment of participants to the trial. Approximately 29% of staff were of non-White ethnicity. Most staff were doctors or midwives, in similar proportions. One-third of staff participants had no prior involvement in clinical trials. Acceptability was endorsed by the majority of survey respondents (69.2%), as "very acceptable" (44.6%) or "somewhat acceptable" (24.6%). Interview findings endorsed acceptability from most staff toward participating in an evidence-based trial such as PREVENT-PE. Despite some concerns about implementation burden, system-level readiness, and counseling high-risk participants, the staff supported integrating such screening into routine maternity care if effectiveness is confirmed.
Conclusions:
The PREVENT-PE trial had a high level of acceptability among healthcare professionals. Staff view risk screening in the third trimester of pregnancy as acceptable, with potential to positively impact patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Preventive Healthcare Services
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System II: Health Perception Pattern
Health Perception Patterns
Health perception patterns offer valuable insights into a patient's lifestyle habits and how they may impact their GI health. These patterns include:
Clinical Trials: Overview
