Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Predicting Amputation using Local Circulating Mononuclear Progenitor Cells in Angioplasty-treated Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia
Published on: September 22, 2020
Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent: a
Domenico Galante1, Ciro Pollio Benvenuto2,3, Simona Todisco2
1Center of Excellence of Cardiovascular Sciences, Ospedale Isola Tiberina - Gemelli Isola.
Insights
Physiology-guided drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary intervention (ph DCB-PCI) shows similar outcomes to drug-eluting stent PCI. This suggests a potential role for physiological assessment in stentless revascularization.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- Physiology-guided drug-eluting stent PCI improves outcomes.
- Clinical benefit of physiology-guided drug-coated balloon PCI is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of physiology-guided drug-coated balloon PCI versus physiology-guided drug-eluting stent PCI.
- To evaluate the feasibility and safety of physiology-guided drug-coated balloon PCI.
Main Methods:
- Propensity-matched analysis of 39 patient pairs from the PROPHET-FFR registry.
- Comparison of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and target-vessel revascularization rates.
Main Results:
- Similar MACE rates at 13 months between ph DCB-PCI and ph DES-PCI groups (5.1% vs 7.6%, P=0.644).
- Target-vessel revascularization rates were comparable (2.6% vs 7.6%, P=0.305).
- One periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in the ph DCB-PCI group.
Conclusions:
- Physiology-guided DCB-PCI is feasible in selected patients.
- No worse outcomes observed with ph DCB-PCI compared to ph DES-PCI.
- Physiological assessment may support stentless revascularization strategies.
Background:
Physiology-guided drug eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention (ph DES-PCI) improves cardiovascular outcomes; however, the clinical benefit of ph drug coated balloon PCI (ph DCB-PCI) remains unclear.
Results:
A propensity-matched analysis of 39 patient pairs (ph DCB-PCI versus ph DES-PCI) from the PROPHET-FFR registry was performed. At 13 months, the MACE rate was similar between the groups (5.1 versus 7.6%, P = 0.644), principally driven by target-vessel revascularization (2.6 versus 7.6%, P = 0.305). A single periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred in the ph DCB-PCI group (P = 0.314).
Major Findings:
Ph DCB-PCI appears feasible in selected patients, with no apparent signal of worse outcomes compared with ph DES-PCI, supporting a potential role for physiological assessment in stentless revascularization strategies.
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
