Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Roughness Impact of Piezoelectric Dental Scaler on Two Distinct Flowable Composite Filling Materials
Published on: January 10, 2025
Effects of Ultrasonic Scaling and Teeth Brushing on Surface Properties of PEEK Prosthetic Restorations
Aleksandra D Čairović1, Mirjana M Perić1, Nevena Čairović1
1Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Belgrade, Rankeova 4, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.
Abstract:
Purpose: This study provides a comparative evaluation of surface changes in BioHPP materials under routine professional hygiene procedures, which is recommended by dentists, twice a year. BioHPP is a polyetheretherketone polymer used in prosthetic dentistry as a frame material. The aim was to investigate whether routine dental cleaning procedures such as ultrasonic scaling and brushing affect the surface proprieties of prosthetic BioHPP restorations. This study was conducted to evaluate the surface properties of different restorations based on BioHPP (veneered with composite resin and polished) after brushing and ultrasonic scaling exposure. Materials and Methods: The BioHPP specimens were divided into three groups. The first group (marked BioHPP) served as a baseline reference for assessing the effect of different surface processing approaches, and no further treatment was applied. The specimens in the second group (BioHPP-P) were polished, while the specimens in the third group (BioHPP-C) were veneered with composite resin. Group BioHPP-P and BioHPP-C of samples was divided into three subgroups: 0-no treatment, 1-exposed to tooth brushing, 2-exposed to ultrasonic scaling. Untreated samples (subgroup 0) served as controls for evaluating treatment-related changes within groups 2 and 3. The surface morphology was investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The structure of samples was analyzed using the XRD technique, and the surface wettability was evaluated. Results: The surface roughness of the samples was evaluated via root mean square (RMS) parameter. Baseline BioHPP specimens exhibited higher roughness values compared to the other analyzed groups. The roughness of the non-treated specimens (0) decreased in the line 59.18→28.84→14.51 nm. Treatment of the samples by brushing and ultrasonic scaling was associated with an increase in surface roughness. Variations in water contact angle values were observed. However, no consistent treatment-related trend could be established. Conclusions: Composite veneered BioHPP showed a tendency toward higher surface resistance to brushing and ultrasonic scaling. These findings should be interpreted within the limitations of an in vitro descriptive study.

