Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Three-Dimensionally Printed Microfluidic Cross-flow System for Ultrafiltration/Nanofiltration Membrane Performance Testing
Published on: February 13, 2016
Performance Assessment of Microfiltration Membranes for Backwash Water Reuse from Sand Filters
Małgorzata Wolska1, Małgorzata Kabsch-Korbutowicz1, Fausto A Canales2
1Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego st., 50-370 Wrocław, Poland.
This study compared three microfiltration (MF) membrane modules for treating water backwash. Module M1 showed superior microorganism removal, while M2 offered the highest permeate flux, making MF a viable option for water reuse.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Engineering
- Water Treatment Technologies
- Membrane Science
Background:
- Utility-scale water treatment plants generate significant volumes of backwash water.
- Recycling backwash water is crucial for water conservation and resource management.
- Limited research exists on microfiltration performance using actual backwash water from diverse sources.
Purpose of the Study:
- To comparatively assess the performance of three distinct microfiltration (MF) membrane modules (spiral PVDF, capillary PP, capillary α-Alumina).
- To evaluate their efficacy in treating backwash water from surface water (SW) and infiltration water (IW) treatment plants.
- To analyze trade-offs between hydraulic performance, contaminant removal, and treatment costs.
Main Methods:
- Filtration cycles of 168 hours were conducted using three MF membrane modules (M1, M2, M3).
- Performance metrics included permeate flux, turbidity removal, dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removal, and total microorganism count (TNM) reduction.
- A simplified cost analysis was performed over two filtration cycles.
Main Results:
- Module M1 achieved the highest median TNM removal (97%), outperforming M2 (84%) and M3 (70%).
- Module M2 consistently provided the highest permeate flux rates across both water types.
- DOC removal efficiency varied by water type, with M2 excelling for IW and M1 for SW backwash.
- Ceramic membrane M3 showed the most variability in performance.
- Logarithmic models accurately predicted early-stage permeate flux (R²: 0.60–0.99).
Conclusions:
- Microfiltration is a viable technology for treating utility-scale water backwash, contributing to water reuse strategies.
- The choice of membrane module (M1, M2, M3) significantly impacts performance based on specific water quality and treatment objectives.
- While treatment costs for backwash water are higher than for raw water, it represents a valuable potential source amid increasing water scarcity.
More Related Videos
07:32Synthesis of Hydrogels with Antifouling Properties As Membranes for Water Purification
Published on: April 7, 2017
12:11A Modified EPA Method 1623 that Uses Tangential Flow Hollow-fiber Ultrafiltration and Heat Dissociation Steps to Detect Waterborne Cryptosporidium and Giardia spp.
Published on: July 9, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Filtration
Testing Water Quality
Biological Treatment of Effluent and Waste Water