Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Protocol for the Evaluation of MRI Artifacts Caused by Metal Implants to Assess the Suitability of Implants and the Vulnerability of Pulse Sequences
Published on: May 17, 2018
Assessment of pre-trained deep learning models in the detection of metal artifacts in axial cone-beam tomography
Shishir Shetty1, Wael Talaat1, Natheer Al-Rawi1
1Department of Oral and Craniofacial Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, 27272, United Arab Emirates.
Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of 3 pre-trained deep learning models (ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNetB0) in the detection of metal artifacts (MAs) in axial cone-beam CT (CBCT) slices.
Methods:
Two researchers calibrated, examined, and collected 1000 axial CBCT slices having crown and restoration-related artifacts (CRS) (n = 200), orthodontic bracket-related artifacts (OB) (n = 200), implant-related artifacts (IMP) (n = 200), root canal filling-related artifacts (RC) (n = 200) and 200 axial slices without artifacts (N) from a single CBCT unit. The image dataset was split at a 70:20:10 ratio for training, validation, and testing. Data augmentation was applied to the training data. Three pre-trained models (ResNet50, MobileNetV2, and EfficientNetB0) were trained, validated, and tested for the ability to classify data. The best-performing model was externally validated using axial images from different CBCT units from the same institution.
Results:
EfficientNetB0 was the best-performing model with 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.98) test accuracy. Its precision, recall and F1 score were 0.98 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99), 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97), and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.99), respectively. EfficientNetB0 showed a significantly higher area under curve (AUC) value (0.98, 95% CI, 0.96-0.99) compared to other models. Its average classification time was 7.1 s. Gradient-weighted class activation mapping attention confirmed the focus of the model on MAs in the images. During external validation, EfficientNetB0 showed an accuracy of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.96) and an AUC-ROC of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.96). There was no significant difference in the performance metrics of EfficientNetB0 between test dataset and external validation dataset.
Conclusions:
EfficientNetB0 demonstrated consistent and acceptable performance across all evaluation stages for the detection and classification of MAs in axial CBCT slices.
Advances In Knowledge:
The study describes the performance of pre-trained model in the detection and classification of MAs. The model can be used by the clinician as a decision-support and quality-assessment tool in the CBCT imaging workflow.
Related Concept Videos
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
