Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

04:06
Setup for the Quantitative Assessment of Motion and Muscle Activity During a Virtual Modified Box and Block Test
Published on: January 12, 2024
Establishing Expert Consensus on Athletic Movement Quality Assessment Components.
Gyan A Wijekulasuriya1,2, Carl T Woods1,3, Aden Kittel1,4
1Institute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
|May 26, 2026
Summary
Experts established consensus on six key movements for a new athletic movement quality assessment. This standardized tool aims to evaluate athletic performance and guide future research in sports science.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Biomechanics
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Lack of a unified athletic movement quality assessment in current literature.
- Need for standardized components related to athletic performance.
- Existing assessments do not consistently include skills relevant to physical fitness tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define the essential components of a novel athletic movement quality assessment.
- To achieve expert consensus on the movements, procedures, and scoring criteria.
- To establish a foundation for a reliable and valid assessment tool for athletes.
Main Methods:
- A 3-stage Delphi study involving 32 experts (academics and practitioners) with experience in athletic movement quality assessment.
- Stage 1: Consensus on included movements.
- Stages 2 & 3: Determination of procedural instructions and scoring criteria using a 5-point Likert scale.
Main Results:
- Expert consensus (>70% agreement) was achieved for all components of the assessment.
- Six movements were agreed upon: active straight leg raise, shoulder mobility test, squat, push-up, lateral bound, and triple hop.
- Scoring criteria focused on range of motion and movement control.
Conclusions:
- Expert consensus provides a strong foundation for a new athletic movement quality assessment.
- The established assessment components offer a standardized approach for evaluating athletes.
- Further research is recommended to validate the assessment's reliability and its association with physical fitness.
