Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Muscle Function Obtained with Motion Mode Ultrasound and Surface Electromyography during Core Endurance Exercise
Published on: August 25, 2022
Immediate Responses to Trunk Muscle Coordination Cueing on Maximal Isometric Lifting Force, Low Back Postural
Brendan L Pinto1, Tyson A C Beach1, Samuel J Howarth2
1Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada ; and.
Abstract:
Pinto, BL, Beach, TAC, Howarth, SJ, and Callaghan, JP. Immediate responses to trunk muscle coordination cueing on maximal isometric lifting force, low back postural displacement, lumbar spine rotational stiffness, and trunk muscle co-contraction. J Strength Cond Res 40(8): 981-990, 2026-Cueing trunk muscle bracing has the potential to reduce the risk of injury by stiffening the spine to prevent motion. However, the effects on force production in high-demand tasks such as deadlifting are unpredictable. In addition, various approaches have been used in research and practice settings to cue trunk muscle coordination, ranging from simple verbal directives to detailed coaching. However, the efficacy of these approaches to immediately modify spine stiffness has not been compared. The objective of this investigation was to compare the immediate effects of a simple verbal directive to "activate your core" and detailed trunk muscle bracing coaching on maximal isometric lifting force production, low back postural displacement, muscular contributions to spine rotational stiffness, and trunk muscle agonist-antagonist co-contraction. Forty subjects (50% women) performed maximal isometric lifting exertions across 3 conditions (baseline, directive, and coached). Data were assessed with linear mixed-effects models ( α = 0.05). Postural displacement decreased and rotational stiffness increased in the coached, but not the directive condition. However, both cueing approaches decreased maximal lifting force to a similar extent, which was not solely explained by agonist-antagonist co-contraction, as co-contraction only increased in the coached condition. Decreases in lifting force may instead be attributable to the cognitive effort and attentional focus imposed by the cues. Thus, cueing trunk muscle coordination for the first time can decrease force production, and simple verbal directives are insufficient at modifying trunk muscle coordination. Instead, detailed coaching with practice may ensure the acquisition and implementation of new muscle coordination patterns.
Related Concept Videos
Isotonic and Isometric Muscle Contractions
Isotonic contractions
Isotonic contractions occur when a muscle changes length while the...
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Muscles of the Vertebral Column
Superficial Layer:
The superficial layer consists primarily of the splenius muscles, which include the splenius capitis and splenius cervicis. These muscles are mainly responsible for the head and cervical spine movements, including extension, rotation, and lateral bending. The splenius capitis...

