Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Measuring the Motor Aspect of Cancer-Related Fatigue using a Handheld Dynamometer
Published on: February 20, 2020
Correlates of Fitness Tracker Ownership and Use in Cancer Survivors: Cross-Sectional Survey
Roberto M Benzo1,2, James L Fisher3, Macy K Tetrick1
1Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Background:
Consumer fitness tracker devices offer scalable opportunities to monitor real-world behavior and support health in cancer survivorship. However, adoption and sustained use outside structured research settings remain incompletely characterized, limiting their integration into survivorship care.
Objective:
The primary objectives were to describe the prevalence of fitness tracker ownership and use patterns among cancer survivors and to identify sociodemographic, psychosocial, and usability-related correlates of device ownership and frequent use.
Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 893 cancer survivors enrolled in the Total Cancer Care protocol at a comprehensive cancer center. Participants completed an adapted online questionnaire assessing fitness tracker ownership, frequency of use, and perceived barriers and facilitators. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify sociodemographic, psychosocial, and usability-related correlates of device ownership and frequent use.
Results:
More than half of the participants (506/893, 56.7%) reported owning a fitness tracker, and among owners, 82.2% (416/506) reported frequent use (most days or every day), including 71.3% (361/506) who wore the device every day. The most commonly used devices were the Apple iWatch (272/506, 53.8%) and Fitbit (147/506, 29.1%). In multivariable analyses, fitness tracker ownership was independently associated with sex, household income, and cancer site. Male participants had lower odds of ownership (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.42-0.87; P=.006), while higher household income was associated with greater ownership (US $50,000-$99,999: aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.13-2.57; P=.01; ≥US $100,000: aOR 3.64, 95% CI 2.41-5.50; P<.001). Ownership also differed by cancer site. Among owners, frequent use was concurrently and inversely associated with self-reported device discomfort (P<.001), low motivation (P<.001), information overload (P=.04), and limited app integration (P=.007).
Conclusions:
In this single-center, predominantly White, higher-income sample of cancer survivors, fitness tracker ownership was common and patterned by demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, while sustained engagement among device owners was associated with psychosocial and usability factors. These findings suggest that scalable, fitness tracker-enabled survivorship care will need to address both structural disparities in ownership as well as behavioral readiness and user experience to ensure clinically meaningful implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Exercise Stress Test
Exercise stress testing, commonly known as a treadmill test, is a noninvasive procedure used to evaluate cardiovascular function and diagnose heart conditions.
Definition
An exercise stress test measures the heart's response to exertion using a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Chest electrodes record the heart's electrical activity through an ECG, and blood pressure is monitored regularly.
Purposes

