Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

04:04
Asthma Detection Research Based on Voice Signal Processing and Machine Learning
Published on: July 22, 2025
Advancing stuttering detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence-based models
Amir Hossein Rasoli Jokar1, Arman Khoshnevis2, Reihaneh Saber-Moghadam3
1Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, MI, United States.
Journal of Fluency Disorders
|May 26, 2026
Summary
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows promise for detecting stuttering, but current systems often miss the speaker's lived experience. Future AI models need to incorporate speaker-informed definitions for better accuracy and relevance in stuttering research.
Area of Science:
- Speech processing
- Computational linguistics
- Artificial intelligence in healthcare
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used for automatic stuttering detection.
- Existing research is methodologically and conceptually diverse, posing challenges for consistent application.
- A comprehensive synthesis is needed to understand current AI approaches and their alignment with lived experiences of stuttering.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review and synthesize research on AI-based stuttering detection systems.
- To examine the specific aspects of stuttering these AI systems are designed to measure.
- To evaluate how AI-measured targets align with the subjective, lived experiences of individuals who stutter.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, including 44 studies.
- Narrative synthesis to analyze study characteristics, datasets, AI models, task formulations, and evaluation metrics.
- Random-effects meta-analyses to pool reported accuracy and F1 scores from relevant studies.
Main Results:
- A significant trend towards deep learning, self-supervised speech representations, and end-to-end architectures in AI models.
- Expanded task formulations beyond binary detection to include subtype classification, temporal localization, and severity estimation.
- High heterogeneity (I² > 85%) in pooled accuracy (86.9%) and F1 score (73.2%), indicating significant variations in methodology and definitions across studies.
Conclusions:
- Current AI systems primarily detect overt speech behaviors, not the broader experiential dimensions of stuttering (e.g., anticipation, effort, control).
- There is a need for AI models that better capture the lived experience of stuttering.
- Future advancements require speaker-informed target definitions, transparent standards, and validated multimodal models.