Related Experiment Videos
Surrogacy of composite endpoints for mortality in trials of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Ilan Richter1, Dafna Yahav2, Danielle R Rome3
1Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, NY, New York, USA.
Insights
Composite endpoints in cardiovascular trials do not reliably predict patient outcomes like mortality. Researchers found poor correlation between composite outcomes and actual patient prognosis, urging a shift towards more patient-centered trial designs.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Biostatistics
Background:
- The reliability of composite endpoints in predicting patient mortality in cardiovascular trials is not well-established.
- Modern composite endpoints are frequently used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the surrogacy of composite endpoints used in recent ASCVD RCTs for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality.
- To determine if components of composite endpoints correlate with patient prognosis.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of primary publications of RCTs for non-acute ASCVD using composite endpoints (≥3 components) published in top-tier journals from 2019-2023.
- Trial-level surrogacy was evaluated using the R² coefficient of determination, with R² ≥ 0.8 set as the threshold for validation.
Main Results:
- Forty-five RCTs met the inclusion criteria; 42% focused on secondary prevention.
- None of the composite endpoint components met the R² ≥ 0.8 threshold for surrogacy of all-cause mortality.
- The correlation coefficient for cardiovascular death was 0.54, with lower correlations observed for other outcomes like myocardial infarction and stroke.
Conclusions:
- Components of composite endpoints in large ASCVD RCTs published in high-impact journals show a lack of correlation with patient prognosis.
- There is a need for journal editors, regulators, and healthcare professionals to advocate for clinical trial evidence that better reflects patient outcomes.
- Improved alignment of trial evidence with patient outcomes is crucial for informed decision-making in cardiovascular care.
Background:
The surrogacy of modern composite endpoints for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality is unknown.
Methods:
We reviewed all primary publications of RCTs for non-acute atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease utilizing composite endpoints published 2019-2023 in first tier journals, and included all trials utilizing composite outcomes of ≥3 components. Trial-level surrogacy of outcomes was assessed using the R2 coefficient of determination, with a threshold for validating surrogacy at R2 = 0.8.
Results:
Forty-five (n = 45) RCTs met the inclusion criteria, of which 19 (42%) tested secondary prevention strategies. The median sample size was 6033 (Q1-Q3, 3684-11,287), median patient age was 64 (Q1-Q3, 62-67), and most participants were males (69%, Q1-Q3 55%-74%). Half (n = 22, 49%) of the RCTs were funded by industry sponsors and the remainder by government agencies. None of the components of the published composite endpoints reached the pre-specified threshold of 0.8 for surrogacy for all-cause mortality. The correlation coefficient for cardiovascular death was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.36-0.72); other correlation coefficients were notably lower. Similar lack of correlation was observed between cardiovascular death and MI, stroke, unstable angina, revascularization and HF.
Conclusions:
Large ASCVD RCTs published in high-impact journals use composite endpoints components that do not correlate with patient prognosis. Journal editors, regulators and healthcare professionals should demand clinical trials provide evidence that is better aligned with patient outcomes to improve informed decision making for cardiovascular patients.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies.
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies