Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Preparation and Implantation of Electrodes for Electrically Kindling VGAT-Cre Mice to Generate a Model for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Published on: August 17, 2021
Vagal afferents gate cortical excitability in a kainate-induced mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy
Taichi Sayanagi1, Kenzo Kosugi1, Luisa Cassini Ascencao2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan; Division of Brain Sciences, Institute for Advanced Medical Research, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
Background:
Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is an established therapy for refractory epilepsy, indicating that enhanced vagal activity can suppress excessive brain excitability. However, whether endogenous vagal tone itself serves as an intrinsic antiepileptic mechanism remains unclear. We aimed to determine if endogenous vagal activity restrains epileptic dynamics and to elucidate the neural pathways involved.
Methods:
We employed an intrahippocampal kainate-induced mouse model of temporal lobe epilepsy and an optogenetic model of hippocampal excitability. We performed gain-of-function studies using cervical VNS (30 Hz) and loss-of-function studies using bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy and selective ablation of VGluT2-positive vagal afferents.
Results:
Cervical VNS attenuated network hyperexcitability, significantly reducing delta power and root mean square (RMS) amplitude, consistent with its clinical efficacy. By contrast, bilateral subdiaphragmatic vagotomy increased delta power, RMS amplitude, and mortality, demonstrating that endogenous vagal activity restrains epileptic dynamics. In the optogenetic model, VNS suppressed, whereas vagotomy exacerbated, light-evoked after-discharges. Crucially, selective ablation of VGluT2-positive vagal afferents largely abolished the electrophysiological signatures of VNS, including power suppression and network desynchronization, establishing that the antiseizure action of VNS depends on intact afferent pathways.
Conclusions:
These findings identify endogenous vagal afferent signaling as a tonic brake on epileptic network activity and provide mechanistic evidence that cervical VNS suppresses seizures by amplifying this endogenous pathway. This work presents a conceptual and mechanistic framework for afferent-targeted neuromodulation strategies aimed at improving therapeutic precision in epilepsy.

