Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Trans-vivo Delayed Type Hypersensitivity Assay for Antigen Specific Regulation
Published on: May 2, 2013
Optimizing risk-benefit in highly sensitized kidney recipient antigen delisting increasing donor access
Cédric Usureau1, Jérémy Siemowski2, Dany Anglicheau3
1Laboratoire d'Immunologie et Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U976, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Université de Paris-Cité, Paris, France; Mathématique et Informatique pour la Compléxité des Systèmes (MICS) Laboratory, CentraleSupélec, Paris-Saclay University, Gif-Sur-Yvette, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), CentraleSupelec, Cancer Data Science Unit, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire (IHU) PRISM National PRecISion Medicine Center in Oncology, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Automated antigen delisting significantly boosts kidney transplant chances for highly sensitized patients. Time-dependent strategies avoiding persistent antibodies are safer, especially with a three-year threshold and 2000 MFI limit.
Area of Science:
- Transplantation immunology
- Nephrology
- Immunogenetics
Background:
- Antigen delisting is a strategy to increase kidney transplant access for highly sensitized individuals.
- The clinical safety and efficacy of automated delisting for human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antigens require further investigation.
- Eight French kidney transplant centers have implemented automated delisting since 2019, adjusting unacceptable HLA antigens.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of automated antigen delisting on kidney transplant probability for highly sensitized candidates.
- To assess the clinical safety and post-transplant outcomes associated with different delisting strategies.
- To determine optimal parameters for antigen delisting in kidney transplantation.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of delisting decisions for 2418 candidates (until March 2025).
- Analysis of two delisting approaches: time-dependent and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI)-dependent.
- Assessment of post-transplant outcomes in 804 recipients.
Main Results:
- Delisting significantly improved transplant probability for candidates with a calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥96.6%.
- A two-fold increase in donor offers was sufficient for cPRA ≥99%, while a three-fold increase was needed for cPRA ≥98%.
- Higher MFI of donor-specific antibodies (dSAs) at transplant correlated with increased graft loss or death risk (24.4% vs 10.7% for MFI >2000 vs ≤2000).
Conclusions:
- Automated delisting primarily benefits extremely sensitized kidney transplant candidates (cPRA ≥96.6%).
- Time-dependent delisting strategies requiring antibody clearance before transplant are safer than those accepting persistent dSAs.
- A three-year time threshold and MFI ≤2000 offer a balanced approach for candidates with cPRA ≥98%.
Related Concept Videos
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
