Cardiac damage stages at follow-up and subsequent clinical outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Yasuaki Takeji1,2, Tomohiko Taniguchi3, Takeshi Morimoto4
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa, Japan.
Insights
Cardiac damage stages predict outcomes in severe aortic stenosis patients managed conservatively, but not those treated with aortic valve replacement (AVR). Echocardiography at 1 year is key for prognosis in non-AVR patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiac Imaging
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Data on cardiac damage impact at 1 year post-treatment for severe aortic stenosis (AS) using echocardiography are limited.
- Severe AS requires careful prognostic stratification to guide management strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic value of cardiac damage stages assessed by echocardiography at 1 year in patients with severe AS.
- To compare the impact of initial treatment strategies (aortic valve replacement vs. conservative management) on outcomes based on cardiac damage.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1991 patients from the CURRENT AS Registry-2 with severe AS.
- Follow-up echocardiography at 1 year post-initial strategy (aortic valve replacement [AVR] or conservative management).
- Assessment of primary outcome: composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure.
Main Results:
- In the initial AVR group, cardiac damage stages were not significantly associated with the primary outcome.
- In the conservative management group, higher cardiac damage stages significantly increased the risk of the primary outcome.
- A significant interaction (P=0.003) was found between initial treatment strategy and cardiac damage stage on the primary outcome.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac damage stages assessed by 1-year echocardiography are valuable for prognostic stratification in severe AS patients managed conservatively.
- This prognostic utility was not observed in patients who underwent initial aortic valve replacement.
- Treatment strategy significantly modifies the prognostic impact of cardiac damage in severe AS.
Abstract:
Data on the impact of cardiac damage based on follow-up echocardiography at 1 year in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are insufficient. The current study included 1991 patients with severe AS who underwent follow-up echocardiography at 1 year after the initial AVR strategy (n = 1211) and conservative management (n = 780) in the CURRENT AS Registry-2. In the initial AVR group, the higher adjusted risk for stage 1, 2, and 3 or 4 relative to stage 0 was not significant for the primary outcome (a composite of all-cause death or hospitalization for heart failure) (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.25-1.04; HR = 0.71, 95% CI = 0.39-1.29; and HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.22-1.48). Meanwhile, in the conservative management group, it was significant for the primary outcome (HR = 2.33, 95% CI = 0.99-5.52; HR = 2.89, 95% CI = 1.30-6.40; and HR = 6.44, 95% CI = 2.62-15). A significant association was observed between the initial treatment strategies and effects of cardiac damage stages at 1 year on the primary outcome (P interaction = 0.003). Cardiac damage stages based on follow-up echocardiography at 1 year were useful for prognostic stratification in patients who received conservative management, but not in those who underwent initial AVR. UMINID: UMIN000034169.
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests