Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 28, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Parameter calibration of finite element model of reinforced concrete arch bridge based on ISOA-RBF neural network
Wenping Peng1,2, Zujun Zhang3, Zhongchu Tian4
1Hunan University of Arts and Science, Changde, 415000, Hunan, China. wenpingpeng@huas.edu.cn.
Abstract:
To achieve efficient and accurate finite element (FE) model updating for reinforced concrete (RC) arch bridges, this study proposes a novel methodology that integrates an Improved Seagull Optimization Algorithm (ISOA) with a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network. First, the base Seagull Optimization Algorithm (SOA) is enhanced through Logistics chaotic mapping and an adaptive attack strategy, forming the ISOA to improve search efficiency and convergence. Second, leveraging the superior nonlinear fitting capability of the RBF neural network, a surrogate model is constructed to map the relationship between key structural parameters and the corresponding static/dynamic responses of the bridge, thereby replacing the computationally expensive full FE model during iterative optimization. Finally, a multi-objective optimization model is formulated by combining static deflections (from arch T-beams) and modal frequencies, enabling a holistic FE model update based on in-situ load test data. The proposed ISOA-RBF framework is applied to a long-span RC arch bridge case study. Results demonstrate that: (1) the ISOA effectively solves the inverse optimization problem in FE model updating; (2) the RBF surrogate model achieves high approximation accuracy, with an average relative error of only 0.62% across 50 validation samples; (3) after updating, discrepancies between computed and measured T-beam deflections are significantly reduced, showing average relative errors below 10% under two static load cases; (4) errors in the first three modal frequencies are less than 5%, with good orthogonality maintained among modes and no modal mixing observed, confirming consistency in dynamic characteristics before and after model updating.
Related Concept Videos
Internal Loadings in Structural Members: Problem Solving
To illustrate this, let's consider a beam OC of 5 kN, inclined at an angle of 53.13° with the horizontal and supported at both ends. Determine the internal loadings...
Fiber Reinforced Concrete
Dynamic Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete
The sonic test is a common method to determine the dynamic modulus. In this test, a concrete beam, sized either 6 x 6 x 30 inches or 4 x 4 x 20 inches, is clamped at its center. Vibrations are initiated at one end of the beam by an electromagnetic exciter unit powered by a...
Prestressed Concrete
Design Example: Distributing Reinforcements in Concrete Sections
Design Example: Dimensioning of Concrete Masonry Construction
The site engineer has laid out a plan for the storeroom with external dimensions of twelve feet in length and eight feet...

